No, I listened to the entire clip, and I still think she is in the wrong. Why they did it is generally very important in the pursuit of ending the organization that did it.

help me woodrow i'm being trolled That's exactly what she said immediately following that comment.

No, she said that we need to do everything in our power to apprehend those who did it and bring them to justice, but she implies that figuring out why they did it is irrelevant in capturing them. Further, I would prefer it if you didn't call me a troll.

I would prefer it if the world wasn't full of halfwits but you can't always get what you want.

And part of that is figuring out why they did it. Yes, figuring out what happened is very important, but even more important than that is figuring why these militants were inspired to conduct the attacks. There are dozens of terrorist organizations, each one has differing motives in most cases. Figuring out why they did it is crucial to finding out what group affiliated with Al-Qeada is responsible for the attack. Furthermore, [b]at the end of the clip,[/b] Clinton says that finding out why they did it is less important than finding and preventing it from happening again, as if the why is not a prerequisite for doing those two things in the first place. As do I, but sometimes I am compelled to argue with halfwits like you. Dunno why, though.

Troll me softly, babe.

Agreed.