JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

Edited by jhermannITJ: 10/7/2023 2:44:46 AM
20
So... 😉 now you're excited, thought it was the most braindead route Bungie could take? "My sister feels her worms gnawing hunger, gnawing away at her for running away from us. She had to keep testing her strength if she didn't want to be eaten alive... and she has no one left to love. Now you see: I needed my Worm exorcised so I could tell you the truth. And didn't I hold up my end of the bargain. I knew you could do it. You've done so many impossible things... O murderer mine". In a response to another comment, you say you're a fan of the Awoken character arcs & I assume are aware of many of their cultural conventions like: how they talk to each other. "sister"... you've heard Mara & Petra us that language... Techeuns & Corsairs use that language. In the above quote, who do you think Savathun is talking about? Ahsa... whom is a cursed Alis Li... 1st Queen of the Awoken... rival of the Sovs; both Mara and her mother Osana. Riven never ran away... her story is still relevant though. And could there BE ANY CLEARER of a confirmation of our role since vanilla D1, "...O murderer mine". "Do you know the legends"? Do you still think I was just pulling my theories from nowhere? Still? It's all the same event. Of course, the Ahamkara appeared shortly after the Traveler terraformed Venus. The Pale Heart is the singularity... the Traveler encompasses it. Time dilates based on gravity... that's what accounts for the seemingly different timelines in the lore when comparing the emergence of different factions/phenomenon. However, the distributary... the fundament... the Ahamkara... the Nine... the Awoken... the Hive came from the same event. I first called your attention to info... how good is your memory? 1st by talking not just about my theories, but I gave you my nickname. It's "Ghost" 😇👍💠 2nd by calling attention to the old D1 Legends Grimoire. My theory remains the same... Mara is corrupt.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by ShadeofArcana: 10/7/2023 5:16:47 AM
    [quote]So... 😉 now you're excited. I thought it was the most braindead route Bungie could take[/quote]? I desperately want you to know, you have the most confusing way of writing. I can't effectively interpret whether you're expressing your own opinion or commenting on my own excitement? As for myself, after slogging and snoring through 3 seasons of "meh", an Ahamkara season actually sounds enticing. If only because the last time a Ahamkara was at the center of the plot (in Forsaken) we actually had some REALLY REALLY GREAT storytelling and lore. So yes, I am excited, even if though this course of events is predictable. I digress sometimes predictable and, on course, is not a bad thing. Even within a predictable course of events, there's still plenty of room to pleasently subvert expectations. Case and point, if HBO had realized this, Season 8 Game of Thrones would've had a much more satisfying conclusion. [quote]In a response to another comment, you say you're a fan of the Awoken character arcs & I assume are aware of many of their cultural conventions like: how they talk to each other. "sister"... you've heard Mara & Petra us that language... Techeuns & Corsairs use that language.[/quote] The word they use is actually "cousin" (provided you are playing the game in English, I understand certain words don't always translate between languages), and the Awoken use this word to formally address other Awoken. Mainly those not of the Reef (the Earthborn and Awoken Guardians). It seems to be a way of showing respect for their shared origins, back in Season of the Lost, Crow once called Petra cousin only for her to harshly retort, "You are [b][i]not[/i][/b] my cousin." Those words carry a lot of weight culturally speaking for tge Awoken, as that's the rough equivalent of disowning someone or complete denial of their heritage. Obviously, Petra was (and probably still is) very angry with Crow/Uldren, and rightfully so, given the nightmarish situation he put her in while he was under Riven's influence. [quote]In the above quote, who do you think Savathun is talking about? Ahsa... whom is a cursed Alis Li... 1st Queen of the Awoken... rival of the Sovs; both Mara and her mother Osana. Riven never ran away... her story is still relevant, though[/quote] This is all wrong, Asha is proto-Worm, basically the species the Hive Worm Gods are descended from. [quote]And could there BE ANY CLEARER of a confirmation of our role since vanilla D1, "...O murderer mine".[/quote] We were only ever called "O murderer mine." At the end of the Last Wish Raid in Forsaken, otherwise this syntax had never previously applied to us, let alone before D2. [quote]"Do you know the legends"? Do you still think I was just pulling my theories from nowhere? Still? It's all the same event. Of course, the Ahamkara appeared shortly after the Traveler terraformed Venus. The Pale Heart is the singularity... the Traveler encompasses it. Time dilates based on gravity... that's what accounts for the seemingly different timelines in the lore when comparing the emergence of different factions/phenomenon. However, the distributary... the fundament... the Ahamkara... the Nine... the Awoken... the Hive came from the same event. [/quote] To be frank, none of this makes sense. Ifi am gifted with one power in this universe, it's brutal honest. [quote]I first called your attention to info... how good is your memory? 1st by talking not just about my theories, but I gave you my nickname. It's "Ghost" 😇👍💠[/quote] "By not talking about my theories" proceeds to talk about theories prior to this statement as if that'll magically gaslight me into believing it's true. [quote]2nd by calling attention to the old D1 Legends Grimoire.[/quote] You've improved in this regard. Of your few recent theories, i have read. I will applaud you for that. My theory remains the same... Mara is corrupt.[/quote]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • How would she have got cursed? (This is genuine curiosity)

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by ShadeofArcana: 10/7/2023 4:30:28 AM
    Take what Herman says with a grain of salt he likes to pose his theories as facts when canonical lore has proven him wrong, quite quite.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • What canonical lore? Quite quite. Look at yourself... kill the messenger, lol. Then peddle his wares as your own.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Look at yourself... kill the messenger, lol. Then peddle his wares as your own.[/quote] Rofl bold word for a dude whose past string of theories consisted of the same exact conclusions as all the other major lore youtubers & theorists, saying you predicted Savathun's revival & Cayde-6's return and that the congruence proved your points only to immediately attempt to invalidate their credibility by declaring that all the other theorists knew absolutely nothing.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by jhermannITJ: 10/7/2023 3:13:39 PM
    Except I didn't & you're lying 🤥 and mischaracterizing. I didn't agree with tubers at all... until they started agreeing with me; and you know that. I never accepted a direct and literal interpretation of the lore... and you scholars always try to paint me as the villain, "by declaring that all the other theorists knew absolutely nothing". Never happened. How was I parroting a literal interpretation of the lore if I was using comparative analysis? It never happened. There is no official canon respective the lore... because much of it was designed to manipulate the player. That's what Brookes confirmed. I know you're trying the Pee Wee Herman (RIP Paul Ruebens) defense, "I know you are but what am I". You're the scholar that was in lockstep with a literal interpretation of the lore. If anyone was regurgitating tubers, lol. Because that's what they did... they relied on a direct literal interpretation per their analysis... same as you. Now, that's ironic because this is the SECOND time in recent months where I caught you using what were my theories... Yup, if anyone is reading this... In the past, they bashed me for the same theories they're now using. The 1st time when I called you on it, you initially seemed on board... but then immediately decided that it was "[the most braindead route]" route Bungie could take (I'm paraphrasing, but that's what you 🫵 said). That's how arrogant and petty you scholars can be. What's your excuse this time? I told you time is all I needed. Savathun returned, almost exactly as I predicted... she manipulated us into it. That's what your 1st quote ultimately represents. And her and Mara's actions & methods are almost identical respective their rule. Cayde will return... and I know my confidence annoys you, but it's playing out very close to my predictions. Heck, Veil Containment & Sundaresh's descent played out exactly as I predicted. Keep making posts where you try and peddle my wares... it's fun 🎈😊 when I see them. It's only going to get worse for you. I wanted to reference something really quick, "It's all the same event. Of course, the Ahamkara appeared shortly after the Traveler terraformed Venus. The Pale Heart is the singularity... the Traveler encompasses it. Time dilates based on gravity... that's what accounts for the seemingly different timelines in the lore when comparing the emergence of different factions/phenomenon. However, the distributary... the fundament... the Ahamkara... the Nine... the Awoken... the Hive came from the same event". That's what I said... "To be frank, none of this makes sense". That's your response. It makes sense because that's how physics work. You'll see once we get inside the Traveler... the Distributary & Fundament are both in there. And they're so close to the pale heart that time progresses so slow that we're going to be able to see and/or experience how it all happened. This is all based on real world physics. That's why a comparative approach to analysis is vastly superior to a literal interpretation. Can't wait for the next post respective a theory of mine you once dismissed 😇 👍💠. And as always... these are just theories, I might be wrong about a lot of it (except I guess I've been lucky so far)... BUT finally, and most importantly; it's just for fun.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by ShadeofArcana: 10/8/2023 7:06:45 PM
    [quote]Except I didn't & you're lying 🤥 and mischaracterizing. I didn't agree with tubers at all... until they started agreeing with me; and you know that.[/quote] More gaslighting, your ego truly knows no boundaries. [quote]I know you're trying the Pee Wee Herman (RIP Paul Ruebens) defense, "I know you are but what am I". You're the scholar that was in lockstep with a literal interpretation of the lore. If anyone was regurgitating tubers, lol. Because that's what they did... they relied on a direct literal interpretation per their analysis... same as you.[/quote] You realize people are, in fact, capable of thinking alike and reaching similar or same conclusions on their own accord, yes? It's a lovely thing called convergence. You might want to familiarize yourself with the term. [quote]Now, that's ironic because this is the SECOND time in recent months where I caught you using what were my theories...[/quote] This is an outright lie, I get I have wounded your pride, but frankly, this is low. I haven't made an actual lore or theory post outside of this one in TWO MONTHS, my last recorded activity in this forum was in response to the discussion of Riven and why Riven isn't and cannot be moraly good. [quote]Yup, if anyone is reading this... In the past, they bashed me for the same theories they're now using. I told you time is all I needed. Savathun returned, almost exactly as I predicted... she manipulated us into it. That's what your 1st quote ultimately represents. And her and Mara's actions & methods are almost identical respective their rule. Cayde will return... and I know my confidence annoys you, but it's playing out very close to my predictions. Heck, Veil Containment & Sundaresh's descent played out exactly as I predicted. [/quote] Again, convergent thinking. Its amazing how many people can achieve the same conclusions like that, gee it's like they're all using the same information. You haven't even stated how anything I said here infringes upon your theories (but frankly you're the only person here convinced that Osans Sov a character we've never actually met in game is sonehow Savathun). The only thing you've done is take credit for general concensus of where the community thinks the story is headed in addition to all the major plot reveals of the past several months. [quote]Keep making posts where you try and peddle my wares... it's fun 🎈😊 when I see them. It's only going to get worse for you.[/quote] I want you to know this reads as: "Lemme make a hollow vague threat because that [i][b]ALWAYS[/b][/i] ends well." Because suddenly passive aggressively harassing your contemporaries for having the same the idea is a [i][b]great[/b][/i] way to make friends and promote a sense of openess and community, under the guise of "I do this for fun." You're not exactly making a great case for yourself. As far as I am concerned, I don't need to bait you into saying something foolish. You've proven you're quite capable of doing that all by yourself. And when you say stuff like the only person you're hurting is yourself, I am just gonna sit back and enjoy the show.🍿🍿🍿 [quote]It makes sense because that's how physics work. You'll see once we get inside the Traveler... the Distributary & Fundament are both in there.[/quote] As devs have stated in the inside of the Traveler is going to be shaped/effected by our experiences, this is possible (for the Distributary maybe if they take player origins into account) but Fundament? A planet we've never set foot on? Unlikely, unless we're talking about inception style, "but we saw it in Savathun's memories" [quote]And they're so close to the pale heart that time progresses so slow that we're going to be able to see and/or experience how it all happened. This is all based on real world physics. [/quote] I admit I don't know much about physics not that I care to. But I am pretty sure you are the only person here convinced that Ahsa, a giant alien space Worm, is somehow Alice Li, and that Savathun secretly Osana Sov parading about as a Hive God. I haven't heard a single person agree with you on that utter nonsense. [quote]That's why a comparative approach to analysis is vastly superior to a literal interpretation.[/quote] So far, the only thing you've proven is how inflated your ego is and how easily your pride is wounded. [quote]Can't wait for the next post respective a theory of mine you once dismissed 😇 👍💠.[/quote] Given your previous statements, I am laughing at hypocrisy.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by jhermannITJ: 10/7/2023 6:41:23 PM
    "You realize people are, in fact, capable of thinking alike and reaching similar or same conclusions on their own accord, yes? It's a lovely thing called convergence. You might want to familiarize yourself with the term". It's not called convergence. Maybe you need to study. The term you're looking for is "consensus". You also don't know what "gaslighting" means either. Next, "Because suddenly passive aggressively harassing your contemporaries for having the same the idea is a great way to make friends and promote a sense of openess and community, under the guise of "I do this for fun." As far as I am concerned, I don't need to bait you into saying something foolish. You've proven you're quite capable of doing that all by yourself. And when you say stuff like the only person you're hurting is yourself, I am just gonna sit back and enjoy the show.🍿🍿🍿" My contemporaries? Lol. And then you immediately proceed with the same passive-aggressiveness you're criticizing. And you try to speak on hypocrisy... 😉. You reap what you sow. I tried to be your friend... the truth is the ego-stroking, the magnanimous obstinance started with you. This isn't harassment... this is truth laid to bare. I accomplished what I wanted... this is your topic, I'll stay out of it. Glad you came around to join the "consensus". I'm going to remember that Osana offer... which I might be wrong about. Here's what we do know as I've stated... I'm not going to link everything in the lore again but I have and you've seen it. Mara lied about refusing the gift... that was Alis. Mara used the 2nd and 3rd Awoken Queens as puppets. She instigated Wars and conflicts to insulate her power and take the Throne. Since Mara took the Throne it's been a dictatorship. Savathun has done exactly the same thing... destroyed her rivals, engineered and started every conflict. So, to clarify, I was waiting for you to say it: Crota has a Throne World? And Oryx has a Throne World? Ok. AND Savathun has a Throne World.... Who else? Mara 😜. I choose my words carefully... "acquainted with"... I knew about them. I didn't forget. And we find the bow of her rival Sjur in it after she was mysteriously assassinated. Just like how the Glykon was anchored & hidden in her Reef. Just like she let Savathun escape and released her from the crystal without us. Just like she took the egg. Just like how she was in league with Riven. Just like how she knew about the pyramid fleet but, didn't warn us. The preponderance of the evidence is overwhelming. Mara is corrupt... her actions and tactics mirror that of the Witch Queen. So, regardless of if Osana is Savathun or not... she's in league with Mara Sov. Or IS Mara... that's a possibility too.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I’m not weighing in on the meat of this argument but I’d like to clarify something. Convergence, or convergent thinking is an absolutely valid terminology. Consensus is different; it’s something that is widely agreed upon. Convergent thought is when two or more people have a similar thought process or end result despite having no interaction with each other. Also, arguing semantics reads as a strawman, intended or not.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by jhermannITJ: 10/10/2023 5:53:51 PM
    I'll give you that point about semantics... partially. In that exchange he started with "gaslighting"... and their use of "convergence" was also wrong, here's why: They're lying. Just a little context. I was gaslit by this person when I first met them here. I've written a lot of creative lore posts on these forums. 99% of the time they're indicated as such.... This person pretended to be friendly... in order to try and bait me (if you read back their comments, you'll see them proactively guarding against me referencing their disingenuous tactics - ["I don't need to bait you"]... ["not a good way to make friends"]). It never worked though... and in fact usually led to insults, because I am a lore nerd 🤓 I know the lore. Whether my "theories" were correct or not I argue them confidently and I have references to back everything up. It has never been a direct literal interpretation and that's where I but heads with some of the other lore peeps here. And even though... my posts are obviously sensationalized they are grounded in an honest evaluation of the source materials and the lore. I label these things as "theory"... using comparative analysis, I suggest that much of it may be inaccurate... and most importantly "It's just for fun". However, these "Scholars" I picked that term on purpose demand(ed), regardless of disclaimer, that a literal methodology be enforced. Or did... until the narrative director basically confirmed that the lore is made of truths, lies, & manipulations... thus a dogmatic literal interpretation would be a mistake. Sorry for this longwinded explanation to why their behavior doesn't qualify for convergent thought... but I am self-critical and the statement is a little semantical and could be interpreted as an effort to misdirect or impugn their credibility over language and grammar. 'Gaslighting' and 'convergence' is wrong because they're lying. It's revisionism. It is the 2nd time I caught them making a post about a "fan fiction", "spinfoil", "brain dead" idea I've written about... using lore I've referenced that was "too old"... or "the wrong lore". And not just me. These scholars bully and dunk on anyone in lore threads that does anything creative. So, there's history. I'm a fun-loving guy, but I don't let people walk on me. "So... 😉 now you're excited, thought it was the most braindead route Bungie could take"? This intro to my comment was based on that history. This person insulted me over this same stuff they're now excited to post about... my "brain dead" theories; that's not "convergence" as they stated. "Consensus" would be the term objective to their perspective shift... because it's an objective truth now... "O' murderer mine". We're the puppets of Savathun... She isn't talking about Xivu - Crota, Oryx, Riven, Nokris, Xol... maybe Ahsa. Xivu too... it just hasn't happened yet. That's "kill the messenger". That's why I said that. Sorry again for the novel, but that's the full context for everything.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • As I said. I’m not weighing in on your (clearly acrimonious) discourse. It seems like you have very conflicting personalities. I’m only commenting on what I read in this interaction and as far as I can see, he used the term “convergence” in a perfectly legitimate context - which is to say that he said people can come to the same conclusions without being led down that route by YouTubers. Whether he’s telling the truth or not is not for me to comment nor, if I’m honest, do I care. In regards to your issues with creativity and lore, I would assume that the vitriol is redirected from frustration at the merging of the creative and lore tabs of the forums. Discussing lore should include speculation - that’s half of the fun but I think when people impart their own head canon, it can appear misleading or self indulgent. I’m not accusing you of those things but perhaps this is why people have taken issue with you? Regardless, there’s never any need to be rude or resort to insulting others.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I don't need you to, but it is a lie... even IF convergent thought is possible, for this poster it's their excuse. What happened is the evidence outweighs their ability to argue against my predictions and theories... that's "consensus". I never followed lore tubers, "which is to say that he said people can come to the same conclusions without being led down that route by YouTubers". This never happened. Tuber lore was based on literalism. If anyone ascribed to their analysis, it's the scholars here. "Discussing lore should include speculation - that’s half of the fun but I think when people impart their own head canon, it can appear misleading or self indulgent. I’m not accusing you of those things but perhaps this is why people have taken issue with you"? I guarded specifically against misleading people... and I can't control other people's insecurities respective if they believe my posts were "self-indulgent". I'm a positive person that didn't go along with their analysis. My motivations were always clear, "It's just for fun". And you said you didn't want involve yourself... then immediately involved yourself twice. That's the definition of strawman... arguing with me over what you reasonably perceived as semantical was understandable UNTIL you refused to acknowledge why I made those statements. And despite me addressing the ambiguity you doubled down... because even though I hoped your comment was in good faith, it's not. The OP is using revisionism to save face & avoid accountability for bullying and antagonizing others for ideas they now champion. That's what my very 1st comment was referencing from the start. I clarified and gave the full context... which your inquiry & critique allowed me to do 😇👍💠. Thnks.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • See, now you’re accusing me of being being in some sort of cahoots with the person you were arguing with. I’m not trying to argue with you, I have no horse in this race - I was making a correction and/or clarification from a purely linguistic stand point. I subsequently replied when you posted a large essay filling me in on your goings on and I offered you reasoning with no ill intent. Forgive me but for someone that claims to be kind and easy going, you seem awfully paranoid and aggressive. As far as I’m aware, I’ve never interacted with you prior to this post nor do I know the people you say you have an issue with so I have no idea why you would make assumptions about my intent. I will leave you to yourself as I have no desire to engage in personal attacks, nor receive them.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by jhermannITJ: 10/11/2023 5:26:26 PM
    "See, now you’re accusing me of being being in some sort of cahoots with the person you were arguing with. I’m not trying to argue with you, I have no horse in this race - I was making a correction and/or clarification from a purely linguistic stand point". I never did. I'm pointing out that initially you accused me of "strawman" which is colloquial for misdirection... the implication being I was avoiding accountability and substance attacking the OPs credibility on grammar. And even though your preamble was ["I don't want to get involved"], you obviously were. Which by definition is "strawman" but I gave you the benefit of the doubt because, in reading back my comment, I saw the ambiguity that you were highlighting. Then, I not only clarified... but gave context on why the OPs words were incorrect and disingenuous citing specific contemporaneous examples (quotes) from my initial comment that are consistent with the context and explanation I provided. And then you responded a 2nd time, were you re-emphasized the original preamble... which now was definitely "strawman" whether you know it not... because you chose to ignore the context and explanation I provided to highlight, once again, your original assumption that I explained was not an effort to misdirect in favor of semantics over substance. I gave you the substance and you ignored it and made the same sins you were accusing me of: semantics & misdirection aka "strawman". Substance matters, context matters.   And I am very easy going, don't project 😇 👍💠. So, now a 3rd response that furthers the strawman ethos... don't address what I actually wrote, psychoanalyze and misrepresent my character and conduct. Further trying to misdirect away from your potential motivations that seem suspect at this point. Because your initial criticism was that the OPs use of "convergence" and my comment about it was semantical and "strawman". I explained why it wasn't but agreed that without full context it could be perceived that way, so I provided it; and you ignored it & now are accusing me of accusing you of being in "cahoots" with OP. I never said that. I wonder why you said that now though... it's funny sometimes how people tell on themselves 😬. Just because I spend 5 mins writing a few paragraphs doesn't make me paranoid or aggressive either... which again, those false misrepresentations of my motivations, character, & conduct IS the definition of "Strawman" aka rhetorical misdirection & manipulation. Are you being malicious? Don't know... don't care, despite your assumptions I'm not as invested as you think.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • “Not as invested as I might think” A footnote at the bottom of one of many enormous replies. The truth is that I had no intent to be malicious but with every one of your replies, I’m becoming increasingly aggravated by your spiel. Firstly, your definition of a strawman isn’t correct. A strawman argument is to hide behind a second argument to deflect from the original. A typical example is, you guessed it, debating semantics. Although the use of a strawman is disingenuous and/or misleading, that doesn’t mean the reverse is always true. I used no strawman. My continued response does not constitute a strawman and I haven’t been misleading or dishonest even once. I engaged to correct you, your replies became increasingly manic and paranoid and as a result, I retaliated. It is my intention to walk away but with each response, you goad me back in. This interaction could have been perfectly amicable but you instead tried to paint me in an unpleasant light. I initially took your evaluation of these “scholars” at face value, I now see that it was likely some other poor sap like me that had a mild disagreement with you. You can’t just keep saying “I’m a laid back person” then continue to exhibit opposing traits, life doesn’t work that way. It’s like saying “I’m not a violent person” whilst in the middle of a bar fight and expecting people to believe you.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by jhermannITJ: 10/11/2023 6:36:06 PM
    You continue to project and misconstrue... I'm still totally amicable. You're taking issue with my counter arguments respective the clear hypocrisy on display. I can say I'm laid back... because I am, I also spent many years studying rhetoric. You know what a true sidenote IS... & quite disconcerting... that in the lore section of video game forum... you're calling my replies enormous. Really? And you're the poster child for "Strawman". "Firstly, your definition of a strawman isn’t correct. A strawman argument is to hide behind a second argument to deflect from the original. A typical example is, you guessed it, debating semantics". The semantics you stuck to even after I clarified and gave context. I was happy to discuss the merits of my premise... but you tried to "hide behind" your initial interpretation... and hid behind your disingenuous preamble ["I don't want to get involved"] as an excuse to why you refused to acknowledge the substance or context. Then, you hid behind... a false characterization of my motivations & you may have unwittingly admitted that you're acting on behalf of the OP. That's the definition of "Strawman", as you provided. It's rhetorical misdirection and manipulation... & hypocrisy. I'm still laid back & easy going 😇👍💠. Are you in "cahoots"... who's to say? Here's some more context for yah. It isn't the 1st time. One upon a time I was arguing with a very intelligent lore person named MC (that's obviously not their tag) we don't often agree, but no denying they know the lore. I don't know exactly what we were arguing about... oh wait, I do... my Cayde prediction. MC was tilting and desperate and provided a quote and link that was supposed to be their "gotcha moment". However, in their haste... they didn't read the comments or context around the cherry-picked quote or link they used.   You know where the quote and link came from? A topic from this OP from 6 months prior. And MC admitted that later. Then the OP and MC had a falling out... The truth & context matters. My initial comment wasn't acrimonious... I briefly pointed out the flip-flop... but then it was mostly just further exposition respective my theory the OP was now championing (in part) with lore I previously cited. Their tone was acrimonious from the start... and they even, unprompted, felt the need to impugn me to another commentor. That forced my hand... because they were deliberately lying about me. We can disagree... but since the OP fails when trying to meet me on the merits... they resort to manipulative tactics in the effort to gain ground or achieve leverage. That's brass tax. It hasn't worked, not even once 😇👍💠.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by R Y U K E R リューカー: 10/11/2023 6:53:17 PM
    But what you’re failing to grasp here is that I genuinely don’t care what interactions you’ve had with in the past nor who they were with. You have quite literally gone as far as to accuse me of attacking you on behalf of someone else that I’ve never interacted with - you are quite literally constructing a narrative. That’s pretty paranoid behaviour. I haven’t done or said anything misleading nor am I hiding behind anything or anyone. I was perusing the forums and saw this interaction and corrected you. The fact remains that in a constructive debate, trying to catch someone out by derailing the conversation via semantic nitpicking is unhelpful and a personal pet peeve of mine which is why I (correctly) called it out as a strawman. I have nothing to prove to you. If you want to go about your life assuming there is a secret cabal following your exploits on a game forum, that’s your prerogative. I can only base any judgement of a person based on information available to me and with each reply you further cement my characterization of you.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by ShadeofArcana: 10/8/2023 10:00:02 PM
    [quote]It's not called convergence. Maybe you need to study. The term you're looking for is "consensus".[/quote] Semantics. [quote]I'm going to remember that Osana offer... which I might be wrong about. [/quote] This is the fundamental flaw of your theory. It hinges upon an [i]idea[/i] that is not proven within the game lore itself. You can comparative analyze all you want, but until actual lore is written to back up your idea, it remains just that. You can't just make up stuff based upon things outside the game, then say that's what is happening and slap obviously incorrect lore on it as "proof." This is why people have problems with your theories. This is why people label them as fanfiction because your theories are based upon what appears to be your own fictional canon you've created to prove you theories. [quote]Here's what we do know as I've stated... I'm not going to link everything in the lore again but I have and you've seen it. Mara lied about refusing the gift... that was Alis. Mara used the 2nd and 3rd Awoken Queens as puppets. She instigated Wars and conflicts to insulate her power and take the Throne. Since Mara took the Throne it's been a dictatorship.[/quote] This is also all wrong. You wonder why people dimiss your theories. This is why, more [i]ideas[/i] that aren't based in canonical lore. This is why people call your theories "fan fiction" because they're based on a series of events that are clearly not backed up by official sources of lore. [b][i]Part[/i][/b] of the reason the Theodocrisy Wars started, weren't entirely sparked by Mara they were sparked by the conflicting ideologies of the Awoken when they incarnated within the Distributary. Mara GREATLY supported the movement to return to Sol because she knew Sol needed their help. Mara was no the only person who held this belief, if you read the Marsenna (instead of outright dismissing it) prior to Event Horizon Alis Li called for a vote to either return to Earth or stay on course. The consensus among the crew of the Exodus Green was to stay on course. Mara's whole goal in the Distributary was to return to Sol and start a new life, remained in the Reef because she didn't want to put the safety of the tens of thousands of Awoken who came with her in jeopardy (and in entry isn't even included within the Marsenna, it's in the Awoken of the Reef lorebook). [quote]Savathun has done exactly the same thing... destroyed her rivals, engineered and started every conflict.[/quote] Yeah, so have other characters in the Destiny Universe. What are you gonna try to claim next? Clovis Bray is secretly Oryx? Rasputin is Xivu Arath? [quote]So, to clarify, I was waiting for you to say it: Crota has a Throne World? And Oryx has a Throne World? Ok. AND Savathun has a Throne World.... Who else? Mara 😜. I choose my words carefully...[/quote] 🤦‍♀️ Mara has a Throne World because Eris warned her of Oryx's immanent approach and the danger he posed to Reef as well as Earth. Given this knowledge, as well as Eris, Riven, and her Techeuns' assistance, Mara carved her Throne World into the Ascendant Plane. [quote]And we find the bow of her rival Sjur in it after she was mysteriously assassinated.[/quote] Again, you're making stuff up, Sjur was Mara's lover, little narrative trope called "enemies to lovers." She was Mara's lover at the end of the Marasenna and going into the Awoken of the Reef lorebook. [quote]Just like how the Glykon was anchored & hidden in her Reef.[/quote] The Glykon is not in the Reef just near it, it's sitting derelict outside it, and the events that transpired aboard it have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the Mara or the Awoken. This is stuff that's in the game, and you can't even be bothered to attempt be accurate. [quote]Just like she let Savathun escape and released her from the crystal without us.[/quote] More misinterpreted lore, Savathun had been one step ahead of Mara the entire time. Savy basically decked herself out with Hive incantations before Mara crystallized her and after Mara exorcised her Worm and broke her crystal, Savathun's spells activated basically pulling the wool over Mara's eyes to perform a bait and switch, returning Osiris to us but allowing her to escape. [quote]Just like she took the egg. [/quote] Again, MORE made up lore and unproven conjecture. We have NO IDEA how Mara got ahold of an Ahamkara egg. If anything, we are probably going to find out the truth of this next season. But given Mara's proximity to Riven, for all we know, the egg was given to her by Riven. [quote]Just like how she was in league with Riven.[/quote] Mara was never "in league" with Riven, Mara was WELL AWARE of Riven's malicious tendencies, which is why she locked away in the Keep of Voices and had the Wish Wall constructed. Mara worked with Riven because she needed her in order to accomplish her own ends, but Riven herself has always had her own agenda. [quote]Just like how she knew about the pyramid fleet but, didn't warn us.[/quote] Sure, Mara has known about a massive threat to us but hasn't been in a position to communicate effectively. First, she was dead and wandering the Ascendant Plane, then she was fighting at the edges of the system and lost contact. We didn't hear anything from or of Mara between Forsaken and Arrivals. Secondly, even Mara didn't know the full scope of threat herself, which is probably the reason she didn't tell us about it immediately. Even then, Mara has left some HUGE hints in our final visit to the Queen’s Court. She legit left holo projections of Pyramid Ships plain for us to see, and they're still there. [quote]The preponderance of the evidence is overwhelming.[/quote] The only evidence you've presented is overwhelmingly fictional. [quote]Mara is corrupt...[/quote] Mara isn't corrupt, she has yet to even steer us wrong, even in the instances where she has withheld information. She's done questionable things in her past, which leads people to mistrust her. But everything she's done from Reef Wars till now has been to protect humanity. If she were as truly selfish and corrupt as you claim, then Mara would have stabbed us in back a long time ago. If Mara were truly corrupt, then her course of actions make no sense. Everything Mara has done from the Collapse through now has been to help people. She single handedly obliterated the Fallen fleet at Ceres to stop the House of Wolves from reaching Twilight Gap and destroying the Last City. She had nothing to gain there (especially since the Wolves who surrendered to her betrayed her) but engaged in a multiple year gorilla war with the Fallen to stop them from going any further. She frigging DIED, attempting to hault Oryx's advance and had a backup plan in case things went south. She crossed the Ascendant Plane alone and returned and found her kingdom a mess. Pulled herself up the bootstraps and continued on. She fought pyramids on the fridges of the system, blew herself up in the process, and was summoned back by Eris Morn. And for what? She's never really asked us for anything in return, aside from our help dealing with Skolas (and Skolas was a threat to everyone, not just the Reef). She's sacrificed and sacrificed, put weapons in Guardian hands that she could've given to her own people, but remains subject to suspicion. At this point, she's borderline Cassandra from Greek myth, cursed with the power to true prophecy, except no one trusts her or believes her.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by jhermannITJ: 10/7/2023 3:18:59 AM
    By Mara... & Osana. So, that Mara could take the throne. Aboard the Exodus Green... amidst a war Mara started to take the throne not from Alis... the 3rd. Alis found out... or was figuring it out. In the lore it says Mara told Alis the truth, then Alis gave her the mysterious artifact (which I believe is a fragment of Soteria)... then Alis just vanished, poof. The truth is Alis was cursed by Mara with the help of her mother the Witch Queen(Osana/Sathona/Savathun). That's my theory. Why would Alis just accept Mara's deceit? Alis was the one, not Mara, to refuse the gift on behalf of her people... but not everyone did, and Mara resented Alis for not accepting making her people Gods. Alis brought the Awoken through one of their most dire moments facing eminent extinction... she just wouldn't disappear and abandon her people. That doesn't make sense. Now Ahsa's story we're led to believe... Hive Wurm God... fine with the tribute for yrs... then one day gets bored with it, rejects it... sees it as a farce. Just leaves... flys in a random direction opposite this location (Sol system) for yrs... at some point loses her memory, gets turned around... ends up right back here crashing into Titan's methane oceans where there just happens to be a Savathun statue? Come on 😜. It doesn't make any sense. The basic logistics of that are highly unlikely. They call her the "Coward". That's Ahsa... that's Alis Li who mysteriously vanished when Mara stole the throne. Every "Wurm God" we've met has been cursed btw... Xol, Riven... Ahsa. You don't want to be a "Wurm God" of the Hive. The Awoken are supposed to be a meritocracy; that changed with Mara & her mother. And strangely any rival of Mara, disappears... dies, gets assassinated, or is cursed. Did you know Riven used to be a confidant of Mara? How about Sjur... she was assassinated, no one knows who did it. Strange how we find her bow in a place called the "Shattered Throne" inside Eleusinia which coincidently is Queen Mara's Throne World 🤯. Of course Ahsa *ahem Alis. What about the 2nd & 3rd Awoken Queens? Puppets of the Sovs... starting wars, manipulating conflicts to insulate their power... all Rivals get eliminated? And btw, Mara has a Throne World?!?! There's only 2 Throne Worlds that we're acquainted with... weird how there are so many similarities between Mara & the other Queen we know. That's exactly what Savathun has been doing with the Hive. Mara is her mother's daughter... and her mother Osana Sov is the Witch Queen. That's my theory. That's what I predicted and that I believe is playing out before our very eyes. The tragedy of the Sovs... it's not about us, we're puppets... pawns, the Mothmen. The main cast: Witness, Sovs, (Maya, Chioma, Soteria, Cayde). The Vanguard are child soldiers fighting for the enemy.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by ShadeofArcana: 10/7/2023 5:33:34 PM
    [quote]In the lore it says Mara told Alis the truth, then Alis gave her the mysterious artifact (which I believe is a fragment of Soteria)... then Alis just vanished, poof. [/quote] The only thing Alis ever have Mara in their exchange was a pitcher of Blackberry tea dumped on her head. After which, Alis them took Mara's parasol out of spite. [quote]The truth is Alis was cursed by Mara with the help of her mother the Witch Queen(Osana/Sathona/Savathun). That's my theory.[/quote] We have already been over a thousand times, neither Alis nor Osana left the Distributary, which is effectively a pocket universe caused by the Event Horizon singularity when the powers of Traveler and Witness clashed during the Collapse. The Distributary never had any interaction with the Hive because it was completely isolated from the Sol. [quote]Why would Alis just accept Mara's deceit? Alis was the one, not Mara, to refuse the gift on behalf of her people... but not everyone did, and Mara resented Alis for not accepting making her people Gods.[/quote] You have Alis completely confused with the Diasyrm, the Diasyrm was the one who started a war over the fact they the Awoken could've been immortal gods but weren't created as such. [quote]The Awoken are supposed to be a meritocracy; that changed with Mara & her mother. And strangely any rival of Mara, disappears... dies, gets assassinated, or is cursed. Did you know Riven used to be a confidant of Mara? How about Sjur... she was assassinated, no one knows who did it. Strange how we find her bow in a place called the "Shattered Throne" inside Eleusinia which coincidently is Queen Mara's Throne World 🤯. [/quote] The only person we have reason to suspect that Mara might've actually legitimately killed was the Diasyrm because she disappeared after seeking Mara out for the truth regarding their creation. She entered Mara's home in the Distributary and was never seen again. As for the rest of the Awoken Queens within the Distributary, they willingly stepped down from their positions, and the new Queen swere elected to replace them. In the lore patrols from Shuro Chi, we learn that Awoken does not use a typical monarchy system. Their rulers are elected by popular vote, even Mara herself was elected to be Queen when the Awoken return to Sol (keep in mind not all the Distributary Awoken returned to Sol, a majority of the Awoken remained within the Distributary). [quote]Of course Ahsa *ahem Alis. What about the 2nd & 3rd Awoken Queens? Puppets of the Sovs... starting wars, manipulating conflicts to insulate their power... all Rivals get eliminated? [/quote] They're still quite alive, they simply chose to step down from ruling just like Alis did. In other words, they basically abdicated the throne. [quote]And btw, Mara has a Throne World?!?! There's only 2 Throne Worlds that we're acquainted with... weird how there are so many similarities between Mara & the other Queen we know. [/quote] You've completely forgotten about the Oversoul Throne, aka Crota's throneworld, and the Dreadnaught to which Oryx affixed his throneworld so he could move it around with him. [quote]That's exactly what Savathun has been doing with the Hive. Mara is her mother's daughter... and her mother Osana Sov is the Witch Queen.[/quote] On the day Savathun is revealed as Osana, I'll eat my own cloak.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon