{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/18/2023 10:25:11 AM
43
It wouldn’t matter in Destiny, they have the strongest aim assist/ auto aim in the shooter landscape. All that fine tuning wouldn’t actually result in anything.
English
-
Nope that myth has long since sailed. Confirmed by Bungie Devs - although the truth is a little more nuanced - MnK has far more aim assist. Reticle Friction is unique to controller but that's only one of two primary components of AA.
-
[quote]Nope that myth has long since sailed. Confirmed by Bungie Devs - although the truth is a little more nuanced - MnK has far more aim assist. Reticle Friction is unique to controller but that's only one of two primary components of AA.[/quote] Wild controller dev that didn't make mnk support says mnk has more aa but can't play mnk. It's been disproven by players that mnk doesn't have more aa... Its not like some hidden thing you can literally test every weapon in private matches.....
-
Your comment has nothing to do with mine? I was referring to destiny’s sim assist broadly. I was not singling out any particular input method.
-
The OP refers specifically only to controller. Then your comment says 'they' have the strongest aim assist in the game. That's why it would read as saying controller has the strongest AA as opposed to MnK, hence my reply about that.
-
If you have an issue with what someone else said, respond to them.
-
It was you and I did. The issue is your post wasn't clear along the lines I explained. They're talking about controller and you followed that with a myth or something not clear.
-
No, I didn’t. I referred to a system in destiny. You chose to pretend I said things I didn’t.
-
You can't NOT single out a specific input - controller - when that's the topic itself and you didn't make any attempt to change that context. - In either case just because D2 has strong aim assist that doesn't mean we couldn't use different horizontal and vertical sensitivity settings, for example and as was specifically mentioned.
-
Controller or kbm, Destiny has the strongest aim assist of any fps game. That’s it. I’m not taking sides in your imaginary conflict.
-
Yeah and as I've JUST SAID high aim assist has nothing to do with the need for individual settings such as separate vertical and horizontal sensitivity settings.
-
Never mentioned seperate horizontal or vertical settings, why are you coming at me over and over again with things I never said? Like, what is your actual problem? I said due to the extremely high aim assist, customising your dead zones won’t make any difference. The difference is so utterly minimal it wouldn’t even break the lock to begin with. Respond to something I’ve actually said, or just leave me alone, for the love of God.
-
Except you didn't make THAT clear EITHER. Here's your verbatim post I responded to: [Quote] It wouldn’t matter in Destiny, they have the strongest aim assist/ auto aim in the shooter landscape. All that fine tuning wouldn’t actually result in anything.[/quote] So the horizontal and vertical sensitivity settings SPECIFICALLY mentioned in the post YOU REPLIED TO would ABSOLUTELY have big results. What you may intend to mean isn't what you're actually saying and now you're jumping into some bizarre victim mode over 2 logical points.
-
[quote]Except you didn't make THAT clear EITHER. Here's your verbatim post I responded to: [Quote] It wouldn’t matter in Destiny, they have the strongest aim assist/ auto aim in the shooter landscape. All that fine tuning wouldn’t actually result in anything.[/quote] So the horizontal and vertical sensitivity settings SPECIFICALLY mentioned in the post YOU REPLIED TO would ABSOLUTELY have big results. What you may intend to mean isn't what you're actually saying and now you're jumping into some bizarre victim mode over 2 logical points.[/quote] How is it a logical point if you’re responding to an argument that’s as never made? You’ve successfully argued with an h willing participate who not only never said the things you argued against, but at no point ever wanted to communicate with you at all.
-
I was responding to a comment about dead zones, why are you so emotional? Go through the rest of my post, I never made the claims you responded to either. Just go away, this has nothing to do with you.
-
Edited by Artisan: 5/20/2023 10:53:35 AMComprehension fail. Reread. I even QUOTED YOU VERBATIM which explicitly contradicted what you said. You neither made your different point to the poster ( you directly replied to ) clear about inputs nor did you specify you were choosing to exclude h/v sensitivity settings. Again, the points you made - quoted - aren't those you claimed you meant. Hey, maybe 'go away' yourself; learn some manners and how to be clear about what you're writing.
-
The comment I responded to was about dead zones. I said it wouldn’t make a difference because of aim assist. Why does this matter so much to you?
-
It was NOT just about deadzones! In your HEAD it may have been. Here's the opening sentence: [Quote] Can we please get [b]more controller settings we can adjust like[/b] deadzones, response curve, [b]differentiated horizontal/vertical sensitivity.[/b] [/Quote] My bolds. You filtered out info from this post and clearly don't even realise it.
-
No, I quite clearly referred to dead zones in my response.
-
Edited by Artisan: 5/20/2023 1:34:24 PMNo you did not. The post responded to was [Quote] Can we please get [b]more controller settings we can adjust like[/b] deadzones, response curve, [b]differentiated horizontal/vertical sensitivity.[/b] [/Quote] Which is explicitly the broader point about controller settings not just deadzones. And your reply does not single out deadzones specifically either: [Quote]It wouldn’t matter in Destiny, they have the strongest aim assist/ auto aim in the shooter landscape. All [b]that fine tuning[/b] wouldn’t actually result in anything.[/quote] So those claims are false, completely false and those are the exact and complete quotes proving it. You've filtered things out IN YOUR MIND and weren't aware of your doing it. You did this TWICE too. Enough, this is INDISPUTIBLE now.
-
Sir, we are discussing [i]me.[/i] I am telling you what my intent was. You don’t get to disagree with me on this.
-
Your INTENT is not what you wrote. I responded correctly and accurately TO WHAT YOU WROTE. No-one can guess you meant something opposed to what you did write. See the quotes. "That fine tuning" ≠ exclusively deadzone settings. And the post you REPLIED TO is very clear those controller settings in general - including h/v sensitivity settings are referred to not what only you know in your mind. Read both complete quotes and this is very clear...and indisputable.
-
And I have told you, again and again and again, that I was talking about dead zones.
-
Yet OUTSIDE YOUR HEAD what you actually said was exclusively "All that fine-tuning". And in addition that was replying to a post NOT limited to deadzones but made clear was about controller settings in general, including differing sensitivities. Do you want me to repost both entire quotes refuting this false claim? It's not what you said and saying it's your intent, only known to you, whilst falsely claiming you said something different is ridiculous.
-
I have told you again and again and again and again what I meant with what I said. There is no ambiguity, it’s all there. I have clarified. Why are you still going?
-
What you intended ≠ what you actually wrote. Then when people, like myself, respond accordingly TO WHAT YOU WROTE AND WHAT IS THE ACCURATE TOPIC CONTEXT you chose rudeness instead of admitting you'd filtered your response to something different and had not made that known to anyone here. In future Be.more.clear.
