{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Cho:
4/11/2022 11:57:06 AM
5
They have their time and place
Sometimes it promotes toxicity yes, most of the time not. My clan has entrance requirements that can’t be shown by in-game means and consequently api trackers are useful
English
-
Would you same the time and the place would be entrance requirements though? If so, I agree - but on the backend of that it leads to other issues. Just knowing the encounters should be enough. Ie on Saturday we did Vow with a guy who had 16 clears & yet he wasn’t capable of any role, it ended up being a hard carry. Meanwhile 2 members with 2-3 clears were picking up the slack. Stats in this instance don’t equate to skill. The argument could be different with KD or things, but even then stats can be falsified
-
We want the clan to be filled with like-people and they’re not the kind of entrance requirements that knowing the encounter would be anywhere near enough. Not a concrete indicator of skill no, which is why we have a tryout phase as well
-
So basically for it to be used as a Resume / CV per say?
-
In this case yeah. External sites are more useful than ingame stats. Those are basically useless
-
I get the reason for it in this situation, but quite honestly I’d never recruit for a clan or anything based on stats. In fact I wouldn’t based on accomplishments either due to the amount of carries / recovs that go on in the game (probably not just for the rewards either). Some experience, with the right skills and personality is more important Imo
