{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/4/2020 7:01:08 AM
6
There’s no nice way to put this, TigersFan, you sound like a buffoon. Did you get into my mushroom stash? If so, what colors did you eat?
Little girls dressing in short skirts for a show isn’t opposing female equality. It isn’t demeaning to women. It’s like saying Robin is demeaning to men because he wears tight clothes and man panties.
The problem would be dressing underage people in sexually appealing outfits. It wouldn’t be wrong because it’s demeaning to their gender, that’s f*cking ridiculous, it would be wrong because you’re dressing children up in inappropriate ways.
English
-
You’re right, I should’ve addressed the actual issue or just not posted at all. I barely even thought about what I posted. That was stupid I my part. Thank you for your honesty.
-
[quote]There’s no nice way to put this, TigersFan, you sound like a buffoon[/quote] That was the nice way to put it
-
[spoiler]Shhhhhh don’t rat me out, man![/spoiler]
-
I’m not saying it’s demeaning female equality, I’m just saying it’s a terrible way to go about promoting female equality. That’s all. I probably should’ve specified better.
-
I wonder, if women started going around doing bad stuff to men wearing boxers and muscle shirts, would these people say they also deserved it? They asked for it? Nah, they'd probably say things like, "Radical feminists are attacking masculinity!"
-
Wait, boxers are sexually enticing?! Better stop then!
