Yes, console exclusives suck, but that’s what happens when a company gives money to get such exclusives.
English
-
At the expense of the players
-
It’s one gamemode though, it’s not like PS players getting the game months early. You’re not gonna suffer that much.
-
So you’re fine with paying the same amount for less content? Even if you don’t get that content until the game dies?
-
I’m missing out on one gamemode. It sucks but I’m not losing half of the game. And sure, I’m not buying the game but I’ve had to miss out on certain destiny weapons cause I play on Xbox. It didn’t kill my experience within the game. And besides, it’s call of duty, in previous titles I don’t play every single gamemode, usually stick to 2 or 3 to play. So losing out on one gamemode will not break the game.
-
Edited by epicperon: 9/25/2019 4:15:00 PMIt’s not like a multiplayer gamemode. It’s the entirety of Special Ops. You won’t get Survival Mode for a year while ps4 players get it at launch. Idk if they’ll have Spec Ops missions like in MW3 but if they do you won’t get those either. So yeah you aren’t missing half of the game. More like a third
-
So do you spend just as much time on survival than you do multiplayer?
-
In MW3 yes. Spec Ops in that game wasn’t just survival. Plus I did really like survival. Again, idk what it’s going to be like in this game. I never intended to buy it to begin with even before this controversy
-
At this point I think it’s safe to say that the majority of people who buy call of duty are going to spend the vast majority of their time on multiplayer. And don’t forget that it is single player stuff, so it’s not like the game being dead doesn’t mean you can’t go back and play the specs ops modes. Hell I’ve gone back to MW2 to do the spec ops missions.
-
Well if you’re fine with waiting a year then ok