{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/25/2019 5:04:07 AM
9
-
I don’t see him as an antagonist in RDR2. Rest of response is in spoilers don’t read if you haven’t finished the game [spoiler]Sure he betrays you and John but he was also being goaded on by Micah, and Hoseas death kinda made him crazy. In Guarma he thinks John betrayed him which is why he left him behind in chap 6. And when he shows up again at the end taking Arthur’s side it really only confirms his suspicion. [/spoiler]
-
Man, I could not disagree more with your spoiler. Dutch is the ultimate paranoid sociopath/narcissist. By the end of the game he’s one of the most despicable characters in the history of games.
-
That doesn’t make him an antagonist
-
Are you seriously saying he isn’t an antagonist by the end of the game? Maybe you should look up the definition.
-
[quote] a person who actively opposes or is hostile to someone or something; an adversary.[/quote] For him to be an antagonist he would have to be Arthur’s enemy, and adversary to be fought against
-
No. a person who is opposed to, struggles against, or competes with another; opponent; adversary.
-
Edited by Darth Turtle: 2/28/2019 2:51:13 AMI mean if you want a definitions debate then sure, the one I provided is from the new Oxford dictionary yours is from dictionary.com. Technically the literary term refers to the person fighting against the protagonist. Regardless Dutch doesn’t fit any of the definitions we’re using
-
I really don’t see how you can say that, but whatever. I’m not arguing about it.
-
I do, I just can't seem to find anything sympathy for him. He was Micah with charisma.
