Point form: * Express topic (Crucible playlists, weapon balancing, movement speeds, so on and so on) * Express interest in topic ( Varied options in game-modes allows players to experience the game in the ways they most enjoy, therefor maximizing player enjoyment. ) * Express conflicting issue with topic ( Crucible playlist removes this ability and results in the average users time being spent often in game-modes that don't provide the best enjoyment. ) * Express interest in solving ( Introducing a whitelist/blacklist filter option for Crucible would allow players to actively opt-out of matchmaking games that feature game-modes they don't enjoy whilst also not splitting the player-base into separate pools. The end. In one average-sized block of text I was able to pick a topic clearly, express why I feel it is important to the popular user base, provide an issue I believe is affecting the topic negatively then finally showcase a brainstormed solution to it that I felt would solve the issue without causing the most damage elsewhere. Clean, polite and objective. I express my interest, show I want it to get better and leave it at that.

It's not a race where the strongest wins. Such situations should be a WIN-WIN situation for both of us. Critic leads mostly to nothing than anger. Your opposite is angered and hurt by your critic and surly not open to any good input you will provide. If you want someone to change his mind or act differently, tell them what you like about them and they will follow. This Book can be a life changer, maybe you try it: https://www.amazon.de/How-Win-Friends-Influence-People/dp/1439199191