{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Scratch:
12/9/2017 6:57:27 PM
1
Good points. We have to accept, that as hunters, we're the scrappy underdogs. Always have been always will be. We survive on wit, cunning, and skill and not fancy exotics. Is it fair? No, but life ain't fair and we rise to the top inspite of exotics, not because of them. Rifts, overshields, eating grenades, diving out of the sky for health, we don't need that nonsense because we can survive with out it. We. Are. Hunters!!!!!! Give the crutches to those who need 'em, all they'd do is slow us down. LOL🙂. ....nah... but, yeah... your totally right🙂👍
English
-
I don't understand why people keep saying that it's because hunters have good gunplay exotics. Because even those are trash. I mean I know people say peacekeepers are bad. And I think it's a matter of opinion but if people think they're terrible I can accept that notion. But assuming they are the trash of the titan exotic pool then why are they so much better than lucky pants? And then their is the ophidian aspect vs mechaneer's tricksleeves... they are just better in every way... better reload and ready speed for any weapon, not just sidearms, and upped melee range. So again, if hunters are gunplay oriented then why are our mid tier exotics worse than gunplay exotics for classes that aren't even suppose to specialize in gunplay? It's just freakin weird xD
