No amount of violence is justified even with the destructive policies of the GOP.
I guess it came back to bite them on the @ss.
After the incident, The House Natural Resources Committee cancelled a vote that would have make it easier for gun owners to obtain firearm suppressors...
🙄
English
-
What exactly is wrong with suppressors in your opinion?
-
Posing the question should offer you a logical response, especially given the fact there's no social requirement to roam with a handgun with a silencer, unless you have malicious intentions. 🙄
-
You must have a warped perception of what a silencer does. It is not like a video game silencer. Silenced guns are still fairly loud. They just make it safe to shoot guns without the use of ear protection. Most silencers are used for hunting. But even if somebody had a silencer with the intent of killing...it's not like they'll go unnoticed.
-
Thats actually wrong. The people that want a silencer are those that want to be able to hunt/shoot without using cumbersome ear protection so they can speak freely without having to yell. A suppressor in now way makes a gun more deadly. In fact all it does is take the decibels down to a safe level. People that carry guns will not use a silencer but those people would like the ability to not always have to shout over ear protection or use clunky electronic noise canceling stuff. You are simply wrong about suppressors. People think that attaching one to your gun makes you have malicious intent which is factually and laughably wrong.
-
[quote]No amount of violence is justified even with the destructive policies of the GOP. I guess it came back to bite them on the @ss. After the incident, The House Natural Resources Committee cancelled a vote that would have make it easier for gun owners to obtain firearm suppressors... 🙄[/quote] I agree that GOP policy is not good (imo) this is not how you change things...if anything it will make the gop push harder for their agenda...