{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/18/2017 6:59:46 PM
1
What's to be skeptical about? It was way better than anything I've seen in the first game
English
-
Look at the comments and you'll see a healthy dose of skepticism. For example, no 60FPS, at least even for PC, but I'll withhold judgement on the grounds that it's just a livestream. Another question is, will the Crucible utilize dedicated servers or will the stick to P2P? I already know the answer to that question but again, withhold judgement. Do not take the reveal at face value, be skeptical about everything you see.
-
Edited by Ishigauche: 5/18/2017 7:06:01 PMThat's why they reduced it to 4v4, less lag. Sheesh. All I can say is boo hoo for 60 fps, it's still good. It doesn't have to be perfect
-
Well what about raids?
-
They aren't revealing every aspect of the game, they want you to find it out. Just be patient and wait for them to tell you...... sheesh
-
Which is why I will remain skeptical, because I want to see more. That is not to say though, that what did they show wasn't good, it was exceptional, but I don't want to get hyped yet.
-
It's not just boo hoo no 60 fps. Ridiculous at this time. If a game doesn't support 60 fps it ain't getting my money. Just get it on PC
-
[quote]It's not just boo hoo no 60 fps. Ridiculous at this time. If a game doesn't support 60 fps it ain't getting my money. Just get it on PC[/quote] Name me 3 open world games which run at 60 fps and 1080p on xbox one and ps4.
-
There's a reason I didn't buy Witcher 3 on console....
