It matters because the words have different meanings.
When I'm reading, I interpret the word for its literal meaning - I don't think of all the phonetically equivalent words. Once I do a double-take, I can realize what the person meant, but that's extra effort on my part.
Why not just be literate?
English
-
But if the words are eliminated and you didn't know they existed you wouldn't have a problem. When I read hello I don't read 'H E L L O' I read it as hello. You could spell it as helo and get the same result
-
Edited by pValue2010: 4/26/2017 12:04:02 PMOk, sure, but that's a pointless hypothetical. When I read a word, I don't concentrate on how it sounds; I immediately interpret it for its definition. Misspelling "their" as "there" isn't merely a misspelling; it's using a completely different word with a different meaning.
-
So when someone is speaking to you do you get confused when they say 'look over there' ? Why would saying 'look over their' confuse you?
-
When I'm interpreting language through sound, spelling obviously isn't an issue since there is none...
-
Edited by MldSqrrl: 4/26/2017 12:12:16 PMThat's probably an issue with you, can you tell what the image is saying?
-
I can read it fine after taking a moment to realize the numbers represent letters, but I think you missed my point. When a misspelling results in a completely new word with a different meaning, it can cause confusion. Correct grammar can be the difference between knowing your shit, or knowing you're shit.
-
But if that's the problem we need hundreds of new words, just look at the multiple definitions of 'of'
-
"Of" may have different meanings, but "their" will never mean "they are." Even if it's never been an issue for you, surely you can understand my point?
-
I see the point but don't see why it's better, maybe it's because I've grown up in Australia and every word has 3 different meanings but I just prefer a context based language, we have that verbally just not written