{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/30/2016 1:30:59 PM
3
This argument has been had since year 1 when the damn class was actually balanced.
Unfortunately, you have the other two classes
And their players
Who know nothing of their class role.(tank, support) and they decide Crucible should be played like a Hunter plays it. (OMG you mean hunter tactics with a Titan!?)
and over year 1, they all got butthurt because they lost the exact engagements they were meant to lose.
Now we're in year 3, and people actually know class designation, yet here we are dealing with the same shitty nerfed bladedancer meant to deal with year 1 idiots.
Hell, half the people reading this don't even realize that a Hunter is meant for PvP, and Titans/Warlocks are meant for PvE
English
-
If you really look at it, titans are the ones meant for pvp because many of their skills are are much more effective for dealing with guardians... Especially the striker which if you play it in pve like you do in crucible, you are going to get roflstomped..
-
Just want to say that your very last bullet point is an opinion, not a fact. Your opinion does not make it true. Warlocks and Titans are only for PvE huh? Prove it. With actually proof, do not break it down with more of your opinions-show me a dev, or anyone at Bungie that distinctly said that, and then Ill believe you.
-
Edited by Jinx: 12/30/2016 8:15:34 PMHit the wrong reply sorry.
