Says the double-duper Clinton supporter; you liked this post: https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/213211648/0/0/1 Too bad you can't delete history like she can. [spoiler]Don't get me wrong though; I hate [i]both[/i] of the c[b]o[/b]ckhead finalists we got for the U.S. presidential election this year.[/spoiler]

It's kinda weird, maybe even a little creepy, that you're looking through posts I liked from months ago.

I only had to swipe the screen up once or twice. :/

Dude a fake Felicity Jones tweet sent you off the rails and scrambling through the posts of everyone questioning you to weave this grand SJW conspiracy against you. It's weird. Stop being weird and going off the handle.

I've had people do [i]that[/i] to me before, so I usually try to provide extensive explanation of my stance so as to avoid various sh[b]i[/b]tposters--the people that literally post random sh[b]i[/b]t because an OP's post is literally one to two sentences. Trust me; if I was pissed, I would have tried a different approach from this (maybe I do get a bit too wordy ._. ).

"Provide extensive explanation of my stance" lol wut. - Gets triggered by fake Felicity Jones tweet - Gets called out - Goes through people calling out's post history to try and "prove" their in on the SJW conspiracy. And what was the post I liked? Something liking a post saying Clinton would be a better President than Trump? Such a SJW stance. I guess most voters are SJW's. Jesus. Chill out. The Felicity Jones thing was news because it bucks the usual trend. Though I wouldn't say this example is anything wild. Jones is in the lead role and by far a bigger star than most of the main cast. I don't think it's a shock that she would be the highest paid star. That it is a story is, as I am sure most articles point out, is that this is generally not the norm even when you have relatively big male and female stars taking center stage in a film.