{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:Septagon Media Club
12/9/2016 11:17:40 PM
7
-
Ya don't say? The books are ok except how Tolkien can explain the detail of a tree for 20 pages. A little much.
-
And the book wasn't as good as the movie
-
The books BLOW the movies away. So much is left out of the movies.. Tom Bombadil, anyone?
-
Then the hobbits get their "anti-wraith swords"? Yeah cuz Eowen totally killed the witch king cuz shes a girl. Good job on that one movie, it totally wasn't Merrys anti nazgul sword that broke the spell, no no it was the fact that only a human girl could kill him. So many things not fully explained. Don't get me wrong, I love the movies but I'm kinda sad Tom and Glorfindel where left out.
-
Totally agree. I think older people like the books more, whereas a lot of kids (not all) prefer movies in general.
-
Thank god Tom was left out. It was excruciatingly boring. Usually the books are better. Not the case for LoTR tbh.
-
It would be hard to watch a book in a film club.
