-
[b] [/b]
-
And they beat the U.S.
-
When was this?
-
[quote]When was this?[/quote]War of 1812 (let the flame war begin)
-
I'm pretty sure that didn't happen.
-
[quote]And they beat the U.S.[/quote]This is true. But today, it's very different.
-
If you count that we never actually declared war on Vietnam, then neither has the US
-
[quote]If you count that we never actually declared war on Vietnam, then neither has the US[/quote]Not formally, but it's clear by the amount of explosives you dropped on Vietnam (more lbs of explosives than all in WW2 combined) that you were fighting a war there. Don't try to get around that. There was even a draft lmao you cant be serious about this argument.
-
This is sarcastic by the way
-
[quote]This is sarcastic by the way[/quote]It only became sarcastic after I destroyed it.
-
No, it always was. It's even listed as one of our wars.
-
Yes, but technically...
-
Exactly
-
They also have only been in less than a quarter of the wars as the US.
-
[quote]They also have only been in less than a quarter of the wars as the US.[/quote]Right, which would explain why America has lost more wars.
-
Edited by Cannon011: 10/18/2016 10:16:55 PMBy lost more you mean...? We've won more wars than Canada has even entered. This is like saying your better at poker than a world champion because you played once and won, while they've played dozens and lost once.
-
Edited by Spartan 22O: 10/19/2016 5:40:01 PM[quote]By lost more you mean...? We've won more wars than Canada has even entered. This is like saying your better at poker than a world champion because you played once and won, while they've played dozens and lost once.[/quote]No I mean Canada was a part of Korea and Afghanistan, and those were at least some what successful, (we helped ward off the communists from taking the south, we helped rout out the taliban and eliminate the safe terrorist haven in Afghanistan) but as soon as the US goes in alone, they screw everything up. Iraq, Vietnam was horrible, Libya...these are all disaster areas. You leave Canada out, you lose. Losers.
-
What do you mean by Canada helping? Did they bring Tim Hortons coffee by cargo plane?
-
[quote]What do you mean by Canada helping? Did they bring Tim Hortons coffee by cargo plane?[/quote]In which war? We lost over 500 troops in the Korean War you ignorant scumbag.
-
Trigggggered. How can you call me ignorant but then infer Canada is the only reason the US won any conflicts and without Canada we struggle.
-
[quote]Trigggggered. How can you call me ignorant but then infer Canada is the only reason the US won any conflicts and without Canada we struggle.[/quote]I'm just saying, it's a trend that things end up in disaster when the US goes in without Canada. Are you going to deny that?
-
It could also be noted that Canada only helps when there's multiple countries already helping. So, would it be Canada as the success factor or the fact that there are multiple countries in the fray?
-
Edited by Spartan 22O: 10/19/2016 9:32:16 PM[quote]It could also be noted that Canada only helps when there's multiple countries already helping. So, would it be Canada as the success factor or the fact that there are multiple countries in the fray?[/quote]Who knows. That's besides the point. Canada has not participated in a war where it ended in disaster, unlike the US.
-
No. The point was you saying the US loses without Canada. Obviously, you cannot make that statement with any logical fact besides the "Well, Canada helps the US when there are 5 plus other countries involved." And now you're back tracking to the , "Well, Canada hasn't ended in disaster unlike the US." Ya know, it's funny. You mentioned Libya to someone else but neglected to mention Operation Mobile in which Canada fired over 240 missiles at Libyan targets. Why bring up Libya - US but not Canada?
-
Canada hasn't been anything but a supporting rile to any war. Just saying.