{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/22/2016 11:54:49 AM
12
It's better than 3, IMO. The first Dark Souls is still the king, though.
English
-
I really wish they would remaster the first. :((((
-
It's only 5 years old, lol. Game still looks and plays great.
-
Edited by Hobokin: 8/22/2016 6:53:32 PM[quote]and plays great.[/quote] I have to disagree with that part. The movement is very clunky, every time you roll it's either a fast or fat roll. It's like there is no medium roll. Everything else is great.
-
Are we talking about 2 or 1? I thought the different rolls were pretty distinct in 1, while 2 seemed to have no mid-roll.
-
1, but 2 also didn't have a mid roll as well.
-
You are right however that 2 had no mid roll, under 70% was the same animation, but lower weight actually influenced your roll speed in more increments than in ds1. And adaptability would extend your i frames to a certain point. (I think it depended on other stats as well, but I wanna say like 26 or something was the general cap for i frames?)
-
Indeed
-
Ds1 has a distinct fast, mid, and fat roll at <25%, <50% and >50% respectively
-
I know it's only 5 years, but it feels so dated compared to II and III. With a remaster they coud [i]totally[/i] make it so much better with new mechanics. Plus I never see anyone else playing the first one anymore. :(
-
Depends on what you're playing. The community for DS1 still has a good 2000-5000 active players on PC. The things such as art direction, boss designs, and level inter-connectivity are all timeless, in my opinion.
-
The interconnection...yeah it's so fun to die on the four kings and have to run AAAAALLLLLL that way back just to die at the boss again. Speaking for the casuals. Havel tanking ftw.
-
Ah. Yeah, I'm on Xbox... Yes, I completely agree with that. It's just the mechanics that feel dated to me.
