{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/19/2016 9:21:53 PM
10
You know I realized something. After going through a lot of your posts, they always end with the other person posting some science you can't come up with a bs excuse for. Then you just go and use the same logic that was disproved again.
You claim that we are all sheeple and we believe all the "lies" from nasa and government. While you stick to the same principles that have been disproven.
I find this Doppler stuff funny. It just showcases how you do not understand basic physics. I'll give you an analogy of what you just claimed with this post.
Let's say a baseball pitch can throw 90 mph. If he get on a train going at a 100 miles an hour then by your logic if he throws to someone ahead of him on the train the ball will never make it. Sound right? Of course not because it's all about relative velocity. The ball is already moving at 100 mph relative to the ground so the speed at which it is thrown is added.
The atmosphere is stationary relative to the ground(not including wind and such) so the sound can still travel over land at the same speed.
English
-
Some responses I do fail to respond to. I regret that. But my responses are not BS. They are intuitive. Its possible I am wrong, but I do not see how trains and planes can serve as any sort of comparison to the atmosphere. The problems I brought up with the speed of the atmosphere and the speed of sound highlight other crushing issues for the round earth. Friction, for one. Friction between the round earth and the atmosphere would be negligible, so whats keeping the air spinning at 1000mph from continuing to accelerate to increasingly devastating speeds? By now the round earth should be one massive storm. It is not. Which leads me to have confidence in the fact that it is Flat.
-
Edited by a hobbit: 8/19/2016 10:05:30 PM[quote]i don't see how trains and planes can compare to earth.[/quote] I literally just said its about relative velocity. Newtonian physics don't change between baseballs and galaxy's. Also your claim with the atmospheric friction is incorrect. The ground is moving at 1000 mph so the air won't get any faster than that. Even if it did then it would slow back down because nothing is making it go faster. You can't make a car go 100 mph by pushing it with a car that goes 90 mph. Edit-spelling to clarify
-
I would like to ask this: you said: [quote]Newtonian physics don't change between baseballs and galaxy's. [/quote] How do we know this assumption is true? We can never verify the theory as regards galaxies, because they are too large.
-
We have data from countless observations of galaxies.
-
Observations from nasa? Lets assume that we cant trust nasa (which I think) how can you prove Newtonian physics on a galactic level?
-
You can't without observational data obviously. However we know Newtonian physics applies to all the planets in our solar system. It's not hard to extrapolate. There is no evidence to show that the laws of the universe change with size or location until you go down to the subatomic level or black holes which we don't understand yet. But your argument is practically based on "don't trust anything the government or private corporations tell you only the facts that I cite are certain"
-
Only the facts I can see are certain. I doubt what others tell me I am seeing when they show me a picture.
-
How come solar eclipses look the same no matter where you are ?
-
The changing geometrical relations as the sun, moon, and anti moon orbit above the surface of the earth. Their orbital positions would look the same in north america as they would when the reach other areas of earth.
-
No they wouldn't. If the earth was flat and a solar eclipse happened then parts of the earth would see the entire sun and entire moon while other parts would only see the eclipse.
