{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/9/2016 2:57:39 PM
4
Just because you give them the rights to your work, doesn't mean they won't pay a commission to the creator.
I'm a freelance software developer. Nearly every contract I've had with every company I've worked with there is a clause in the contract that states the work I do and code I write will belong to that company when I'm finished.
I still get paid.
English
-
That sounds like a shitty deal- I can understand that in software development, but this isn't some program you wrote up for a corporation to use [i]forever[/i]. Graphics and photos these days are now licensed out from the content creator, unless the aforementioned corporation really, really wants it at which point a new license is drafted to properly accommodate the original content creator whilst still maintaining their rights to the original work.
-
It's just business man. If you don't like it, don't submit artwork.
-
It'd be business if the commission rates were available before they tried to license the work of the artist.
-
Don't submit your artwork then. Why do you insist on crying about on here? Clearly no one cares.
