{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/7/2016 3:11:39 AM
2
The cop panicked. 6 shots is 6 shots too many. The man was a known criminal and was armed. A tazer had been used but it's unclear if it missed or not. The guy refused. He shouldn't had. Should the cop had pulled the trigger? No. Tbh I think he probably fired off way more than he meant, let alone fire in the first place. I would've preferred the cop beat the dude half to death and arrest him but even that goes against common police practice.
I don't think this was a result of bad police or the result a criminal refusing. I think this is a result of the fact that police vs criminals is a domestic war. And in war there are casualties. Rip that criminal. May god have mercy.
English
-
It's just police carelessness for human life, and incompetence on the job. These two men should not be officers if they can't properly subdue the man without riddling him with bullets.
-
A cops priority is his safety and civilian safety over the suspected criminal. Cop lives > criminal lives. The police officer who shot could be the most honest down to earth man you could've met. But once paranoia sets in it'll mess a man up. Before this incident he could've been completely worthy of being law enforcement, after this incident however. That's up to a judge to decide.
