Due to the repost of this topic (for the third time). I feel like I also need to repost why I don't support it. After all they only made the new post so new readers would not see any negative feedback today.
[quote][spoiler]EDIT: I know there are some spelling errors. I hate the auto correct on the iphone. Please just bare with it. Thanks[/spoiler]
While I agree it's a nice idea on paper. In practice it would be a nightmare.
Look at what's already happening:
1 A few people have the idea being on the GC means there idea gets looked at first. (Done had to use one person as a example of this. I felt bad about it but it needed to be pointed out.
2. The GC gets to by pass every one to give ideas to bungie with the clam "the players support this" with only there word to back it up.
3. Closed door "talks" by a small group. Yea when has that ever been in any way a good thing.
4. The small group gets to push players around. Think about it even thow you say "no special treatment" most players will still see the "I'm part of the GC and don't support this" and get scared away from posting real feedback.
4. The bad methods that the GC is to stop are being used to to get support for it or scare people away. I said I don't like the idea. And for 3 days I have been harassed (out side the forums), called stupid, and told "Cosmo supports it so you should to". Really?
5. Most players already feel you only support or hear ideas from the "elites" and "streamers only". Because of this people feel even trying to voice there views is a pointless waste of time. And you want to add another "select group" between you and the players?
The list just keeps going. I love the game. I really do. It's all I play (really the only game I own for my xbox 1). But with the "elites" and "I'm special crowd" like they are my friends have stopped playing. They feel that you have to be a top 1% or there is no point in playing. This has left me with a hard choice. Play solo (let's face it most LFG groups I find have 1 or 2 "I'm special" people who dictate how you are to play) or don't play at all.
I can't tell you the number if times I've turned on the game and tried to find a raid or trials group only to be talk down to or belittled by some one who thinks they are "special". That is till I pull out elmblums, shaders or gear that they don't have. Really? Is this what the game has come to "prove your worthy to play or don't play". Just makes me wanna go watch Netflix instead. And I know I'm not the only one that's feels this way.
Sorry getting a bit off topic. But I hope you can see my side. There is enough "I'm special" as is. Adding another group (that's right private forums = special in the eyes of the rest) to the list is just a bad idea.
I can give you a suggestion right now that would make a lot of players feel better. Find one post (not from a elite, streamer, or YouTuber for a change) and ask the players what they think about it. They would be overwhelmed with the "bungie wants my input on a idea. That's cool" it won't matter if they like it or hate it. They will love that for once you asked them. You might have to add "no name calling".
I just feel that the GC would end up only supporting ideas that serve there own self interests. It will also drive a deep gap between people like me who feel you only care about the top few. It will become if your not part of the GC there is no point in posting feedback.
Please find a better way.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" - Edmund Burke
I've done what I can.[/quote]
English
-
I didn't know malphisto had obsessed fans..
-
There is no need to re-post your feedback, I already took account of it the first time... Also, this is not a re-post. This was the first out of like...5-6+ posts that I'll be making in to cover all the various aspects regarding the Guardian Council. Each post will be linked to the previous post as well.
-
I have not reposted this. Posted it one time in each of the 4 threads. I'll have to look into this as it's not me reposting it.
-
[quote]Due to the repost of this topic (for the third time). I feel like I also need to repost why I don't support it.[/quote] Your exact words.
-
Yes. 1 post in each repost of the same topic. So you can make as many post as you like over the same idea. But I'm only allowed to disagree in 1? If it's been posted more than that then something weird is going on. Maybe I missed something. I found 4 posts. Posted my thoughts in each of the 4 posts.
-
[quote]Yes. 1 post in each repost of the same topic. So you can make as many post as you like over the same idea. But I'm only allowed to disagree in 1?[/quote] The subject is the Guardian Council, but each post has been a different topic thus far within said subject. You need to bare in mind that I am the one who has to read EVERY. SINGLE. COMMENT. I am not being paid for my time in all of this. If you are going around copy/pasting the same exact thing over and over again, all its doing is wasting my valuable time. As for what you can and can't do? Well you can technically do whatever. But just because you CAN do anything doesn't mean you SHOULD, though. You've already made it abundantly clear that you don't agree and would rather the whole thing be aborted outright. You are just repeating yourself over and over again without actually offering anything new to the discussion.
-
[quote]The subject is the Guardian Council, but each post has been a different topic thus far within said subject.[/quote] Same idea. Different ways to word it. [quote]You need to bare in mind that I am the one who has to read EVERY. SINGLE. COMMENT.[/quote] That's personal. Every one should be able to read objecting views in each post. Not just 1. [quote]I am not being paid for my time in all of this. If you are going around copy/pasting the same exact thing over and over again, all its doing is wasting my valuable time.[/quote] Could this not be reversed? [quote]As for what you can and can't do? Well you can technically do whatever. But just because you CAN do anything doesn't mean you SHOULD, though. You've already made it abundantly clear that you don't agree and would rather the whole thing be aborted outright. You are just repeating yourself over and over again without actually offering anything new to the discussion.[/quote] Again. reversed? This idea as it stands now not the whole "bungie needs to talk more". Find a better way. There have been plenty of other suggestions besides a "elected group" to say they speak for all. With careful wording to make it look good. Can I go back to playing the game now? Those that do play don't have the time to seek out every post about the same thing.
-
[quote]Same idea. Different ways to word it.[/quote] No, that is incorrect. This post is clearly outlining the general [b]Terms of Service[/b] for Council Members. Meanwhile, the second post is concerning the process in which the Community and Council would interact with one another, the actual details of [b]Submitting Propositions.[/b] Both posts are listed under the same subject but both clearly cover two different topics regarding it. Now, if I were using copy/paste to just repeat myself over and over again then yes, THEN your assertion would be true. [quote]That's personal. Every one should be able to read objecting views in each post. Not just 1.[/quote] The same could be true for supportive views as well, or someone who has an idea and just keeps re-posting their idea trying to get as much attention for themselves as possible. Is there anything actually stopping you from doing it? No, of course not. But as I said, just because you CAN do whatever you want doesn't mean you SHOULD, though. Everything in moderation. [quote]Could this not be reversed?[/quote] No? I'm the one who took on the responsibility to manage this. You are under no such obligations, meaning you are free to ignore whatever you please, unlike me. [quote]Again. reversed? This idea as it stands now not the whole "bungie needs to talk more". Find a better way. There have been plenty of other suggestions besides a "elected group" to say they speak for all. With careful wording to make it look good.[/quote] Again, not really. I can't see how you could "reverse" that. And many people have given many different ideas. But just like with you disagreeing with the Council, that does not mean I suddenly decide to abort this. There are many more who likewise agree with and support the GC as well, and you need to take their feelings into account on this as well. [quote]Can I go back to playing the game now?[/quote] Weird. I was under the impression you could play and type on your phone at the same time. No one is forcing you to keep responding back to me. =P
-
[quote]No, that is incorrect. This post is clearly outlining the general [b]Terms of Service[/b] for Council Members. Meanwhile, the second post is concerning the process in which the Community and Council would interact with one another, the actual details of [b]Submitting Propositions.[/b] Both posts are listed under the same subject but both clearly cover two different topics regarding it. Now, if I were using copy/paste to just repeat myself over and over again then yes, THEN your assertion would be true.[/quote] Ok. Same idea. But a way to keep "normal views" Fromm seeing all of it. Same as a tv show on one channel with half the story and the same show on another channel with the other half both running at the same time (news outlets do this a lot). Work on 1 part at a time. This gives both supporters and non-supporters fair time. [quote]The same could be true for supportive views as well, or someone who has an idea and just keeps re-posting their idea trying to get as much attention for themselves as possible. Is there anything actually stopping you from doing it? No, of course not. But as I said, just because you CAN do whatever you want doesn't mean you SHOULD, though. Everything in moderation. [/quote] Again reversed. Both sides same coin. [quote]No? I'm the one who took on the responsibility to manage this. You are under no such obligations, meaning you are free to ignore whatever you please, unlike me.[/quote] Ignoring it is the same as "doing nothing". What good does ignoring something do? [quote]Again, not really. I can't see how you could "reverse" that. And many people have given many different ideas. But just like with you disagreeing with the Council, that does not mean I suddenly decide to abort this. There are many more who likewise agree with and support the GC as well, and you need to take their feelings into account on this as well.[/quote] I do. Every one can post there opinion. I just disagree with yours. [quote]Weird. I was under the impression you could play and type on your phone at the same time. No one is forcing you to keep responding back to me. =P[/quote] Sorry not a dreg. It takes 2 hands to play or 2 hands to reply. Saying nothing does nothing. Groups use this tactical well. It the just keep bashing them with it till they give in. (Give In = stop voicing there view). It's the "who ever gets the last word wins" (LOL just noticed how that applies in game as well). It's who ever has the most time gets what they want (you in this case).
-
[quote]Ok. Same idea. But a way to keep "normal views" Fromm seeing all of it. Same as a tv show on one channel with half the story and the same show on another channel with the other half both running at the same time (news outlets do this a lot). Work on 1 part at a time. This gives both supporters and non-supporters fair time.[/quote] Actually, I would say its more akin to a single series with different episodes playing where everyone has equal opportunity access. As you've noticed, even though its been like 3-4 weeks since I made this post, I'm still in here responding to stuff. Likewise, I plan on having each and every subsequent post linking to the previous one, allowing everyone the chance to read up on stuff that they might have missed. [quote]Again reversed. Both sides same coin.[/quote] No, its actually quite literally a verse taken straight from my Ethics 101 professor. I get what you're trying to say with it, just because we can make a Council doesn't mean we should. However, as I have already explained numerous times all throughout, there is greater reason to make said Council than there is not to. Fact of the matter is that we, the Community, have been presented with a challenge, to see if we are actually capable of pulling something like this off. Should we fail? Then the fault is entirely on us for not being able to step up to the plate. If we succeed? Then the ball is effectively in Bungie's court. If they choose to fumble at that point? Then the resulting PR disaster will prove devastating for them. Can the people work together to prove others wrong? We'll find out... [quote]Ignoring it is the same as "doing nothing". What good does ignoring something do?[/quote] I think you missed the point I was making. Oh well, it really wasn't that important anyways. [quote]I do. Every one can post there opinion. I just disagree with yours.[/quote] Then you shouldn't feel a need to be so forceful about it. [quote]Sorry not a dreg. It takes 2 hands to play or 2 hands to reply. Saying nothing does nothing. Groups use this tactical well. It the just keep bashing them with it till they give in. (Give In = stop voicing there view). It's the "who ever gets the last word wins" (LOL just noticed how that applies in game as well). It's who ever has the most time gets what they want (you in this case).[/quote] You don't find that logic a tad ridiculous? You place too much importance on getting the last word. The argument/conversation as a whole is what's important. Sometimes taking the last word can ultimately hurt your case or cause others to think poorly of you. That's IF you care what other people think. I will impart some wisdom to you. I served three years on my school's Debate Team. Speaking from experience, the last word is actually the least important part. The starting arguments, the first response and the counter response are what matter most. In terms of forums? If it is your desire NOT to support something, like the Council for example, then the best thing you could hope to do is given your disagreement and then avoid the topics like the plague. The reason being is that each and every time you and me say something to one another, you are assisting to bump the post itself. 9 times out of 10, people won't bother reading the comments section, they will simply stick to the OP. Likewise, the post is what they will see/read first, at which point they will either agree or disagree with it. Your comment won't honestly play that big of a role in influencing that decision, assuming what you said even actually gets seen. In other words, your actions are more supportive than anything else. As for me having time, I'm a night owl. Both me and my wife are Gamers and lately she has been playing FF7 for the first time. So while she is doing that, I'm sitting back watching her and helping out, likewise while reading/responding to stuff on here. So I wouldn't say that I have MORE time, per say, rather I'm just good at managing my time.
-
If you can't see the flaws in those responses there is no need to point them out. Then you try to flood people with paragraph after paragraph, knowing most people don't have time to deal with it or read it all. Your trying to sell people on "there is no other way but my way". Resulting disaster for bungie? Like it would be spun off any number of ways to prevent that. Just like you will spin later if the GC fails that it was not the GC fault it was the "distructive" (like me) that did it. Happens every day in the government. You can't force bungie to step up. They just have to do it on there own. Hope your wife likes the run of FF7. One of my favorites. Still love going back doing plays throughs of it. May I suggest watching final fantasy advants children after. Good movie that ties into the story.
-
She watched the movie first a couple years back and was lost with a lot of it, relying on me to explain things to her. But now she's making more sense of it as she plays through the game. Anyways. There were no flaws in anything that I stated, you should be more than capable of deducing that for yourself. I expect you to be able to. Since you made mention of it, I can only assume that the reason for said response is because you apparently feel pressured to reply. I've said before that you don't NEED to keep responding to me. In fact, its more than fair to simply take a pause and resume later on which is something I do quite often. In fact, that response you just gave me reads like a jumbled mess with no real cohesion, its just all over the place. Do yourself a favor and take a reprieve if you truly must insist on continuing. Actually here, I'll do you the favor and I'll be the one to step away for a bit instead. I could do with laying down and stretching out anyways.
-
You know for a smart guy you really do miss the over all. You continue to talk down to me (and others) because you believe your self to be smarter. That's not the case. Do I have the ways and means to debate you. Yes. Do I feel the need. No. Everything I have said has been carefully chosen for a reason. Even the way I have said it. Phycology 101. Do you still not get the "simple is better" reference??? ;-)
-
The fact you feel the need to say any of that is more an indication of a possible inferiority complex. Whether you feel I'm smarter than you or not is irrelevant. If you want to think I'm condescending then that is your prerogative. In my opinion, the only one who is trying to assert that they are "smarter" here is you, especially with this comment you made. At this point, the conversation has just devolved into pointless nonsense and male bravado. I'll be taking my leave of this now. You are welcome to have the last word, since you have already admitted that you care so much about it. Good day~
-
Copy/Paste = Re-post You don't need to keep doing it, I already got it the first time.
-
It was not for you. It was for every one. Not every one looks at every post. Part of democracy.
-
Fair point. Then if you change anything, please add a note at the top so I know what to look for then.
-
If I edit any of my posts (other than spelling iphone hates me sometimes) I add edit: at the end. I don't change what was originally stated.
-
I'm not asking you to edit. I asked that if you insist on just re-posting the same thing over and over that, if you decide to change anything, to put a note at the top to let me know. That way I don't have to spend the time re-reading your feedback.
-
I'm sorry your mad I put EDIT: at the bottom? Ok then because making things more convent to you is so important. If I edit something (witch I have stated "I don't change what I said") I'll put it where ever. Why does this just seem like your saying I'm always "editing" my posts? Copy/paste = same thing. Response could be different. I give you credit your good at manipulating things. But, then again all politicians are.
-
Edited by Malphisto: 7/2/2016 10:17:32 AMActually you're just confusing yourself and mistaking it for me apparently being some sort of skilled manipulator... Which is hilarious, don't get me wrong. Just...don't worry about it. I'll figure something out for it on my own. Yeesh...
-
Ah no. But you believe what ever you like. Trust me things are not always as they seem.
-
Edited by Tsukuyomi Zero: 7/1/2016 6:19:53 AMMost of that is nonsense.
-
Sorry you can't understand it. How many of the lackeys are going to troll me for not supporting.
-
[quote]lackeys [/quote] lol, I can't be bothered addressing a copy and pasted argument I have seen multiple times, hence me considering it nonsense. Also I'm lazy. But, I'l waste my time addressing two points. [quote]2. The GC gets to by pass every one to give ideas to bungie with the clam "the players support this" with only there word to back it up.[/quote] Nope, they would have to have threads from the Community to back up their assertion. [quote]3. Closed door "talks" by a small group. Yea when has that ever been in any way a good thing. [/quote] Lol, conspiracy theories.