{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/16/2016 11:55:51 PM
5
He's got a point. Overwatch is great but 60 bucks is quite a lot for MP only. I play on PC so I only paid 40, but even still.
English
-
Agreed. I like Overwatch and all, but at this moment it's not worth $60 on console imo. Then again Titanfall was multiplayer only, though I can't remember if that was $60 as well.
-
Yes it was, almost all your multiplayer only games are $60. I do include CoD and Battlefield games in this because the single player campaigns are so short people rarely play them more then once if at all.
-
Overwatch probably could've succeed if it was free-to-play on both PC & console... Guess Blizzard didn't want to risk it.
-
It did succeed even without going f2p lol
-
Edited by Vox Mortuis: 6/17/2016 12:34:51 AMI think it's better that you have to buy it. It discourages hackers. Perma ban first offense, how many more times will they be willing to buy it if they know they'll just lose $40-$60 more.
