How's the Steve cult, bud?

[quote]How's the Steve cult, bud?[/quote] Not so much a cult as it is... let's call it, an "Elite Organization of Steve's."

I thought you had a problem with the term "salty", old man. Trying to be a relatable asshole, now?

[quote]I thought you had a problem with the term "salty", old man. Trying to be a relatable asshole, now?[/quote] Oh, don't get me wrong - I still have a problem with the word, and there's plenty more words I still have an issue with. Most of them have been overused to the point where the word has lost all its meaning. Also, learn your place you -blam!-ing pleb. Don't speak unless spoken to.

Oh, I'm just throwing the jab and moving on. Ain't no time for your nonsenses

[quote]Oh, I'm just throwing the jab and moving on. Ain't no time for your nonsenses[/quote] That's right, pleb. Keep moving.

Holy shit, you're an absolute, overly aggressive, arrogant asshole who thinks other people aren't worth your time unless they're spoken to directly. Nice front, I'm sure you realize if you spoke like that to someone in person, you'd get punched in your entitled little teeth. I was going to reply your other reply and how upset you were, telling me that I deflect even though I'm only mimicking how you reply, but now I see that by your standards, only speak when spoken to you pathetic sniveling pleb. You amount to absolutely nothing compared to me therefore do not deserve to speak in my presence unless I tell you otherwise. Of course, this is your standard. So you're not worth my time so I'm done wasting it on you.

[quote]Holy shit, you're an absolute, overly aggressive, arrogant asshole who thinks other people aren't worth your time unless they're spoken to directly. Nice front, I'm sure you realize if you spoke like that to someone in person, you'd get punched in your entitled little teeth.[/quote] Most people [i]aren't[/i] worth my time. You're not even worth my time. This is entertainment for me. And I do speak like this to people in person. You know what would happen if someone took a swing at me? It would give me a legitimate reason to unholster my concealed carry Glock 26. Hit me. I [i]dare[/i] you. [quote]I was going to reply your other reply and how upset you were, telling me that I deflect even though I'm only mimicking how you reply, but now I see that by your standards, only speak when spoken to you pathetic sniveling pleb. You amount to absolutely nothing compared to me therefore do not deserve to speak in my presence unless I tell you otherwise. Of course, this is your standard. So you're not worth my time so I'm done wasting it on you.[/quote] Lmao, you can't talk down to me you -blam!-ing peasant. Learn your god damn place, kiddo. Not only can you NOT reply to my other response, you're desperately trying to find a reason to exit this discussion so you can save your worthless ass. You weren't mimicking me, I was answering questions while you were avoiding them. Now you're just making even more excuses. You know, I think it's pretty funny. A few nights ago, you lost a discussion with me while I was on my alt. Today, you just lost another discussion with me.

HA you're such a pussy. You wouldn't even fight back. You have to carry a gun with you to compensate for your lack of manhood. It must be a sad existence justifying your pathetic life with a piece of gunmetal strapped to your pants. Just goes to show that you're ignorant enough to talk down to people because you'd shoot them if they retaliate out if anger. You're a hate monger, just like your future king. Don't get me wrong, I support the right for firearms, and any kind that can't do mass damage (like explosives) but I support them as means for defending yourself and others from non-instigated attacks, like acts of terror or public shootings. But if you shoot someone because they punched you because you instigated the punch, you deserve to be charged to the fullest extent of the law. Thanks for further proving to me that your not worth my time or the air you breathe. So continue to live your sorry excuse of a life.

This isn't salt? I knew for a long time coming that he wouldn't be the primary. And why would I hold any animosity towards Trump? He didn't win against Bernie. Trump is only going to win now because of pity votes from people who would never vote for Hillary.

[quote]This isn't salt? I knew for a long time coming that he wouldn't be the primary. And why would I hold any animosity towards Trump? He didn't win against Bernie. Trump is only going to win now because of pity votes from people who would never vote for Hillary.[/quote] 1. Now you're in denial. 2. Trump is still in the race. You can blame it on "pity votes" all you want if it makes you feel better about Bernie losing, but at the end of the day the American people (adults) will vote for whatever candidate has their best interests in mind. Clearly, Bernie was not that candidate.

Most Bernie supporters don't vote, because they realize their votes don't count

I'm actually okay with the outcome. It's time to abandon the sinking ship! But no, really, there is no mention of Bernie. You mentioned him. Trump wast running against Bernie, so why is that relevant? And in certainly not in denial. I'm still going to write in Bernie's name. For all you know, he could still possibly win with written in names. At this point, history will be made no matter who wins. If Hillary wins, it'll be the first Female President. If Bernie wins, it'll be the first written in name President. If Trump wins, it'll be the last president.

[quote]And in certainly not in denial. I'm still going to write in Bernie's name. For all you know, he could still possibly win with written in names. At this point, history will be made no matter who wins.[/quote] ^^^^ In denial of Bernie's loss last night. [quote]If Hillary wins, it'll be the first Female President. If Bernie wins, it'll be the first written in name President. If Trump wins, it'll be the last president.[/quote] For someone who recently made the argument that people should think without an external bias, and also accused me of having an external bias, comments like this make your own biases quite obvious.

Okay okay, if Trump wins, it'll be the richest president. It was only a joke. Don't get so Butthurt. Also, it's pretty gloomy out today. Guess that means I'm in denial! You're really quite the character if you think me saying "I'm okay with his loss" is me being in denial. I think you need a dictionary definition to duly understand.

[quote]Okay okay, if Trump wins, it'll be the richest president. It was only a joke. Don't get so Butthurt. Also, it's pretty gloomy out today. Guess that means I'm in denial! You're really quite the character if you think me saying "I'm okay with his loss" is me being in denial. I think you need a dictionary definition to duly understand.[/quote] Am I butthurt? Not at all, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. You're not in denial because it's gloomy out, you're in denial because you're [i]actually[/i] in denial. You refuse to accept Bernie's defeat and still think he has a chance. You saying you're okay with his loss was NOT the part of your reply which made you sound like you're in denial. I'm fully aware of the definition of "denial", you just choose to misrepresent my argument to make it easier for you to attack. I believe they call it a "Strawman Fallacy." I even QUOTED the part that made you sound like you were in denial and NONE of it said ANYTHING about you being in denial because you said, "I am okay with his loss." Just in case you forgot, or if you're just that -blam!-ing retarded, here is EXACTLY what you said, and EXACTLY what I said, word for word: [quote][quote]And in certainly not in denial. I'm still going to write in Bernie's name. For all you know, he could still possibly win with written in names. At this point, history will be made no matter who wins.[/quote] ^^^^ In denial of Bernie's loss last night.[/quote] Bernie still lost, and that's what is important. =)

[quote][quote]Okay okay, if Trump wins, it'll be the richest president. It was only a joke. Don't get so Butthurt. Also, it's pretty gloomy out today. Guess that means I'm in denial! You're really quite the character if you think me saying "I'm okay with his loss" is me being in denial. I think you need a dictionary definition to duly understand.[/quote] Am I butthurt? Not at all, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. You're not in denial because it's gloomy out, you're in denial because you're [i]actually[/i] in denial. You refuse to accept Bernie's defeat and still think he has a chance. You saying you're okay with his loss was NOT the part of your reply which made you sound like you're in denial. I'm fully aware of the definition of "denial", you just choose to misrepresent my argument to make it easier for you to attack. I believe they call it a "Strawman Fallacy."[/quote] Yet you still think I'm in denial. I'm not a moron. I can read numbers. I can obviously tell he's lost the primary. That doesn't stop me from voting for him. 2 names on the ballot does not mean that they're the only 2 we can for for. That's called being a sheeple, not in denial. I'm not going to vote for Trump or Hillary just to prove to you that I'm not in denial. [quote]I even QUOTED the part that made you sound like you were in denial and NONE of it said ANYTHING about you being in denial because you said, "I am okay with his loss." Just in case you forgot, or if you're just that -blam!-ing retarded, here is EXACTLY what you said, and EXACTLY what I said, word for word: [quote][quote]And in certainly not in denial. I'm still going to write in Bernie's name. For all you know, he could still possibly win with written in names. At this point, history will be made no matter who wins.[/quote] ^^^^ In denial of Bernie's loss last night.[/quote][/quote] Still Butthurt, obviously. :^) [quote]Bernie still lost, and that's what is important. =)[/quote] I wouldn't say important, but it is true. That's my personal opinion, however.

[quote][quote][quote]Okay okay, if Trump wins, it'll be the richest president. It was only a joke. Don't get so Butthurt. Also, it's pretty gloomy out today. Guess that means I'm in denial! You're really quite the character if you think me saying "I'm okay with his loss" is me being in denial. I think you need a dictionary definition to duly understand.[/quote] Am I butthurt? Not at all, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. You're not in denial because it's gloomy out, you're in denial because you're [i]actually[/i] in denial. You refuse to accept Bernie's defeat and still think he has a chance. You saying you're okay with his loss was NOT the part of your reply which made you sound like you're in denial. I'm fully aware of the definition of "denial", you just choose to misrepresent my argument to make it easier for you to attack. I believe they call it a "Strawman Fallacy."[/quote] Yet you still think I'm in denial. I'm not a moron. I can read numbers. I can obviously tell he's lost the primary. That doesn't stop me from voting for him. 2 names on the ballot does not mean that they're the only 2 we can for for. That's called being a sheeple, not in denial. I'm not going to vote for Trump or Hillary just to prove to you that I'm not in denial. [quote]I even QUOTED the part that made you sound like you were in denial and NONE of it said ANYTHING about you being in denial because you said, "I am okay with his loss." Just in case you forgot, or if you're just that -blam!-ing retarded, here is EXACTLY what you said, and EXACTLY what I said, word for word: [quote][quote]And in certainly not in denial. I'm still going to write in Bernie's name. For all you know, he could still possibly win with written in names. At this point, history will be made no matter who wins.[/quote] ^^^^ In denial of Bernie's loss last night.[/quote][/quote] Still Butthurt, obviously. :^) [quote]Bernie still lost, and that's what is important. =)[/quote] I wouldn't say important, but it is true. That's my personal opinion, however.[/quote] 1. Yes, you are a moron. And you are in denial. You continue to believe that Bernie still stands a chance. The cards have already been dealt and the odds are not in Bernie's favor. A vote for Bernie is ultimately a vote for Trump. This is chess, not checkers, kiddo. It's time to take off your voter training wheels and at least vote smart if you actually want your vote to count. 2. I don't think you have any idea what "butthurt" actually means. Explain to me in your words what "butt hurt" means to you, and why you think I'm butthurt. Keep in mind, Bernie lost, so there's really nothing for me to be butthurt about. On the other hand, your preferred Presidential candidate lost the nomination last night, so the likelihood of you being butthurt is far greater than the odds of me being butthurt. 3. It is important [i]and[/i] true. =)

[quote][quote][quote][quote]Okay okay, if Trump wins, it'll be the richest president. It was only a joke. Don't get so Butthurt. Also, it's pretty gloomy out today. Guess that means I'm in denial! You're really quite the character if you think me saying "I'm okay with his loss" is me being in denial. I think you need a dictionary definition to duly understand.[/quote] Am I butthurt? Not at all, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. You're not in denial because it's gloomy out, you're in denial because you're [i]actually[/i] in denial. You refuse to accept Bernie's defeat and still think he has a chance. You saying you're okay with his loss was NOT the part of your reply which made you sound like you're in denial. I'm fully aware of the definition of "denial", you just choose to misrepresent my argument to make it easier for you to attack. I believe they call it a "Strawman Fallacy."[/quote] Yet you still think I'm in denial. I'm not a moron. I can read numbers. I can obviously tell he's lost the primary. That doesn't stop me from voting for him. 2 names on the ballot does not mean that they're the only 2 we can for for. That's called being a sheeple, not in denial. I'm not going to vote for Trump or Hillary just to prove to you that I'm not in denial. [quote]I even QUOTED the part that made you sound like you were in denial and NONE of it said ANYTHING about you being in denial because you said, "I am okay with his loss." Just in case you forgot, or if you're just that -blam!-ing retarded, here is EXACTLY what you said, and EXACTLY what I said, word for word: [quote][quote]And in certainly not in denial. I'm still going to write in Bernie's name. For all you know, he could still possibly win with written in names. At this point, history will be made no matter who wins.[/quote] ^^^^ In denial of Bernie's loss last night.[/quote][/quote] Still Butthurt, obviously. :^) [quote]Bernie still lost, and that's what is important. =)[/quote] I wouldn't say important, but it is true. That's my personal opinion, however.[/quote] 1. Yes, you are a moron. And you are in denial. You continue to believe that Bernie still stands a chance. The cards have already been dealt and the odds are not in Bernie's favor. A vote for Bernie is ultimately a vote for Trump. This is chess, not checkers, kiddo. It's time to take off your voter training wheels and at least vote smart if you actually want your vote to count. 2. I don't think you have any idea what "butthurt" actually means. Explain to me in your words what "butt hurt" means to you, and why you think I'm butthurt. Keep in mind, Bernie lost, so there's really nothing for me to be butthurt about. On the other hand, your preferred Presidential candidate lost the nomination last night, so the likelihood of you being butthurt is far greater than the odds of me being butthurt. 3. It is important [i]and[/i] true. =)[/quote] I'm sorry you can't handle being factually devastated in an argument, friend. It's best to let the Butthurt consume you.

[quote][quote][quote][quote][quote]Okay okay, if Trump wins, it'll be the richest president. It was only a joke. Don't get so Butthurt. Also, it's pretty gloomy out today. Guess that means I'm in denial! You're really quite the character if you think me saying "I'm okay with his loss" is me being in denial. I think you need a dictionary definition to duly understand.[/quote] Am I butthurt? Not at all, I'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. You're not in denial because it's gloomy out, you're in denial because you're [i]actually[/i] in denial. You refuse to accept Bernie's defeat and still think he has a chance. You saying you're okay with his loss was NOT the part of your reply which made you sound like you're in denial. I'm fully aware of the definition of "denial", you just choose to misrepresent my argument to make it easier for you to attack. I believe they call it a "Strawman Fallacy."[/quote] Yet you still think I'm in denial. I'm not a moron. I can read numbers. I can obviously tell he's lost the primary. That doesn't stop me from voting for him. 2 names on the ballot does not mean that they're the only 2 we can for for. That's called being a sheeple, not in denial. I'm not going to vote for Trump or Hillary just to prove to you that I'm not in denial. [quote]I even QUOTED the part that made you sound like you were in denial and NONE of it said ANYTHING about you being in denial because you said, "I am okay with his loss." Just in case you forgot, or if you're just that -blam!-ing retarded, here is EXACTLY what you said, and EXACTLY what I said, word for word: [quote][quote]And in certainly not in denial. I'm still going to write in Bernie's name. For all you know, he could still possibly win with written in names. At this point, history will be made no matter who wins.[/quote] ^^^^ In denial of Bernie's loss last night.[/quote][/quote] Still Butthurt, obviously. :^) [quote]Bernie still lost, and that's what is important. =)[/quote] I wouldn't say important, but it is true. That's my personal opinion, however.[/quote] 1. Yes, you are a moron. And you are in denial. You continue to believe that Bernie still stands a chance. The cards have already been dealt and the odds are not in Bernie's favor. A vote for Bernie is ultimately a vote for Trump. This is chess, not checkers, kiddo. It's time to take off your voter training wheels and at least vote smart if you actually want your vote to count. 2. I don't think you have any idea what "butthurt" actually means. Explain to me in your words what "butt hurt" means to you, and why you think I'm butthurt. Keep in mind, Bernie lost, so there's really nothing for me to be butthurt about. On the other hand, your preferred Presidential candidate lost the nomination last night, so the likelihood of you being butthurt is far greater than the odds of me being butthurt. 3. It is important [i]and[/i] true. =)[/quote] I'm sorry you can't handle being factually devastated in an argument, friend. It's best to let the Butthurt consume you.[/quote] So out of everything I wrote, that's all you have to say...? I think we both know who's factually devastated in this argument. It would be the person who's desperately trying to avoid answering any questions in this argument. Since you're ignoring my entire argument, one can only assume that: 1) You can't actually think of an intelligent response, or 2) I'm right, and you know it. All I want you to do is answer is this one simple question question: [b]Explain to me in your words what "butt hurt" means to you, and why do you think I'm butthurt?[/b] A question so incredibly easy should be a piece of cake for the "intellectually superior Bernie supporter", which is why I don't understand how it can be such a difficult task for you to answer the question.

Lol you're getting so upset. I made a mockery of you in another post and here you are doing my job for me. You assumed I was in denial with a hollow point. Evidentially, you were wrong, yet your still won't let it go because you're clinging onto your little sinking ship of "internet Triumph" and now you've literally made yourself into a broken record that numbers off it's own points on multiple occasions. You should just quit this while you're behind, because it's only going to get worse from here.