{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by JG WENTWORTH 877 CASH NOW:
6/7/2016 10:00:11 PM
10
The wall can be paid for in many ways that doesn't take money from the country.
1)We can end all remittances to Mexico ($24 billion per year)
2)Increase Visa fees to come here(unknown amount)
3)Stop trading with Mexico (we lost roughly $50 billion last year to them, already lost $20 billion from January through April)
4)Hell, he could even have people pay to put their name on the wall, that would save mexico some money.
Also, people bring up race when the offender is white but get mad when race is brought up with a non-white offender.
The key witness was released from the trial because they were saying good things about the university.
For -blam!-s sake, he's not deporting all mexicans you retard, he's deporting all ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.
English
-
So you're saying that when we screw Mexico over for their deficit to us, China won't say "okay! Time to cash in on the US's debt!" We wouldn't be able to pay for that. Our country would literally fall apart if we tried to pay that off. So the next step is invasion. You clearly don't understand the risks of cashing in a debt. Debt is good, in small amounts. It builds relationships between countries. But our debt towards China is out of hand. Also, taking money from China is essentially taxing them. Trump supporters hate taxes. This literally proves the selfishness of a trump supporter, showing that you care about nothing but yourselves.
-
China would never invade us. They depend on the US and our allies for basically everything
-
[quote]Stop trading with Mexico (we lost roughly $50 billion last year to them, already lost $20 billion from January through April)[/quote] For the sake of argument, Trump supporters should stop using trade deficits as examples of "losing money." The U.S.'s trade deficit with Mexico is as harmless as my trade deficit with my local grocery store. Seriously, Trump's foreign policy is pretty good in terms of non-interventionism. His trade practices? Borderline delusional.
-
But you can use the fact that you give them money as leverage. Without the US, Mexico loses $50billion per year, which would be more than enough to pay for a wall.
-
So, blackmail and bully other countries to get our way? Sounds like Trump.
-
When other countries are taking advantage of us, we need to fight back.
-
And we lose all the goods we trade with them, which would equate to [i]50 billion dollars worth[/i]. That's only going to hurt American businesses that rely on those goods. They likely came from Mexico because that was the cheapest option. Now they have to find another source. An embargo isn't the answer. George W. Bush made the same mistake by trying to protect the American steel industry. It might help American steelworkers, but any other industry reliant on steel is going to pay the price.
-
Our economy can handle losing trade with Mexico, their country can't.
-
Arguably, yes. But it isn't really justified to put that kind of strain on American businesses. Through an embargo, it isn't really Mexico paying for the wall. Businesses that rely on Mexican goods will be paying for the wall.
-
The business that rely on mexican goods are the ones that move over there and basically get slave labor from the mexicans and sell their products here.
