{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/9/2016 6:54:19 PM
6
America actually conceptualizes freedom in economics, social policies, and trade; so when someone who wants to impose limitations on that is running for office, of course it's radical. It's a geopolitical issue, stop comparing countries who can't hold a candle to America.
[quote]It works in Denmark and other European countries[/quote]
That's cool does Denmark and other European countries have the population, the wealth, the ethnic diversity, and same resources that America has? No? Then I guess applicability is irrelevant.
If it isn't irrelevant then I'll apply Hong Kong and Singapore as two shining examples of successful implementation of free market capitalism.
English
-
I was gonna comment this. :P
-
They are state capitalist.
-
No the state promotes ease of doing and creating business by loosening regulations and tax burdens.
-
Places like China have free markets, that are influenced by the government. They are state capitalist.
-
State controlled industry is not capitalism, nor is it a free market. What was your major?
-
Edited by LiamCDM: 5/9/2016 7:08:40 PM[i]State capitalism is usually described as an economic system in which commercial (i.e., for-profit) economic activity is undertaken by the state, where the means of production are organized and managed as state-owned business enterprises (including the processes of capital accumulation, wage labor, and centralized ...[/i]They are state capitalist. They aren't actually communist. They have re=rudimentary free markets. They have McDonalds. That's one of the best examples.
