{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/6/2016 9:05:23 PM
11
WW1 huh? Geez we get it, you're not cod. I guess I just don't get how people get so excited for military shooters when it's just the same thing that's been done do death but with slightly better graphics.
English
-
Edited by Zachary: 5/9/2016 6:00:40 AMYou are a new kind of stupid.
-
But I appreciate irony
-
Edited by Zachary: 5/9/2016 6:00:06 AMWhat? Do you know what irony means? I don't think you used it in the right context there bud.
-
There has never been a triple A WW1 shooter.
-
I honestly don't understand this comment...
-
I can't understand this comment. Is this satire?
-
So, the Futuristic setting hasn't been "done to death"? Considering the fact that a mainstream shooter hasn't had a WWII setting in what 9 years? I sure can't tell you the last time we've had a WWI mainstream shooter.
-
Name me a WWI FPS then
-
Verdun.
-
PC only, not a triple A title.
-
Because killing fake computer people is fun, I guess.
