They are different. You can't make Halo 2 or 3 over and over again. 343 saw that the series needed to evolve to survive and they took the course of action they saw fit.
English
-
True, but it doesn't mean you can't compare them. Personally Halo 3 has been my overall favorite total Halo experience. Halo 4 had a good story but the multiplayer wasn't as balanced (similar to Reach), and Halo 5 has fun, back-to-basics multiplayer but the story suffered. Neither game was as good a total package to me as Halo 3. Maybe Halo 6 will be find that same magic again.
-
I understand that you can compare them, but OP is trying to make a point that 343's Halos are shitty when they are truly just different.
-
And Natural selection took it's pick. Halo Died on Nov 12th 2012.
-
It died when Reach came out but got revived when 5 came out.
-
Reach was a great game.
-
Reach was so bad.
-
A fun Halo game. Only if 343 could ever make a fun game.
-
H5 is good. Some people like Reach because it is easier and more casual.
-
If it wasn't for Reach, I would've remained terrible at Halo 3, or every other Multiplayer. So I owe it a lot. When I got XBL in 2008 - Halo 3 was just wayy too hard to get in, there was no learning steps. It was just - playing against skilled Players. Reach allowed me to get better at Online FPS. While it was a bit easier, not casual. It got a lot more people into Halo. It is still a challenge.
-
Reach was known as the second most casual Halo. People liked Reach because it was easier than 2 and 3.
-
[quote] People liked Reach because it was easier to get into than 2 and 3.[/quote] That is why so many people liked it. Halo 3 was like a brickwall, if you're new to Online Multiplayer. Many veterans, (bungie fanboys) even dislike Reach - but even they are all hypocrites as they like Destiny.
-
Halo 3 was liked more because it was more competitive on top of other reasons.
-
Way to difficult for new people to get into.
-
Edited by SILEN7 KILLER90: 4/27/2016 7:16:11 PMTrue. But that was good.
-
No, because it's fanbase is still strong and it still brings in cash. It may have evolved or changes but it certainly isn't dead, no matter if you like the game anymore or not.
-
It's a Terminal Illness. It won't die immediately. But it's on route. [quote]it's fanbase is still strong [/quote] 343 fanbase is actually quite small. and Super blind.
-
Not as blind as Bungie's fans lol
-
I'm not a Bungie Fan - well since Destiny...
-
You are impossible to talk to. I'm not saying their games are the best Halos or even good ones but at least I'm not dwelling on the past like you are. How about instead of telling 343 how shit they are doing, you help them by giving them constructive criticism to craft the Halo games how you want them.
-
I used to give constructive Criticism in the Halo 4 days.They did not listen.
-
Did you try during Halo 5? When they literally are listening to EVERYTHING their community says?
-
By the time of Halo 5, I and many others stopped caring about Halo. There is a reason most of the old community don't play or care about Halo anymore. Just new people.
-
"Most" You have zero numbers for that too. I am part of the 'old community' and I'm still supporting 343 as they are the only ones who are trying to live up to Halos legacy. 343 does listen, and the fact that you will leave one of your favorite series behind simply because of one game, which they recognized as a mistake, is total bullshit.
-
Sprint alone says otherwise. The fact that they still refuse to acknowledge it is ridiculous.
-
It isn't though. Maybe if it was just added in to Halo 2 and 3 like Halo 4 did but 5 was recreated around these abilities, sprinting being one of them. If I go there and say "change your whole game, I hate it," they will not do that, they will hear me and see what they can do better but they will not change the fundamentals of Halo to suit a small minority's wants.