{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/8/2016 3:22:53 PM
5
Lol if you have more than 2 you're doing something wrong. Capture A & B and hold them down. Teammates that go for the triple captures mess up the spawns and ruin the control. Take 2 zones and hold them down.
English
-
No, I completely agree with you. But how often do you actually see a group of randoms lock down 2 objectives?
-
Amen. The minute the run for the last zone, the enemy spawns at your starting point and try to take the first one.
-
[quote]Amen. The minute the run for the last zone, the enemy spawns at your starting point and try to take the first one.[/quote] Why don't people get this? Keep them semi spawn trapped, don't get greedy - make sure you get your heavy. (Maybe Titan smash theirs) and rinse and repeat. If you follow that strategy and still lose, the other team was just better - that happens sometimes.
-
I don't disagree with you at all, but that strategy only works with a full fireteam (or if you get REALLY lucky with a group of pugs). Most of the time you end up needing to recap B, or the spawn gets flipped, or both. And, especially in year 2 with the advent of the sniper meta, I'm seeing more and more people getting 0 caps. Just bypassing their spawn objective entirely and running [i]near[/i] B to camp. Not sure if it's [i]because[/i] of snipers being more popular, or because of the flood of noobs, or some other reason, but it's happening nonetheless.
-
Exactly. I've seen games start and I capture A(my start point for example). But some of my teammates run past A, they skip B, and go to cutthroat C. There is no strategic advantage to going straight to the enemies starting zone. Because even if you capture it they start spawning where your team started.
