>Waits for the "if they had guns they would've been fine" response
Edit: maybe if they were allowed to carry rocket launchers and ar's they would've been fine.
Edit2: if any of you play counterstrike or watch it, you know that they should've force bought instead of eco'd.
English
-
Anybody who uses hyperbolic arguments proves themselves to be an idiot.
-
What's wrong with sarcasm?
-
You look like a fool who doesn't have a meaningful argument.
-
Who's the real fool? The guy that made a mocking statement or the guy that took it seriously?
-
Most definitely you, without question.
-
HURRRRRRRRRRDERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
-
Edited by Def_Man: 12/3/2015 12:30:17 AMNo one would have been fine, but I wouldn't be surprised if less people got hurt. A lot of shooters would second guess their targets if they knew there's a good chance civilians might have guns. Just a thought. That's probably why they were wearing body armor or maybe they were anticipating more police.
-
If they had guns they would've been fine ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
-