JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

originally posted in: FACT: ORANGES ARE COLORED ORANGE.
12/1/2015 3:33:18 AM
17
Fun fact, Oranges are named after the color and not the other way around. Prove me wrong.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • The fruit came before the colour. The word “orange” derives from the Arabic naranj and arrived in English as “narange” in the 14th century, gradually losing the initial “n”. This process is called wrong word division and also left us with apron (from naperon) and umpire (from noumpere). Orange was first used as the name for a colour in 1542.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Because in order to have a word for something, it must first exist in reality or thought. Because colors only exist if we see them, a representation of the color must have come before the word. Thus, the fruit came before the color.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Actually things were orange long before we assigned it the word. Sunsets have been around for a long time, much longer than the fruit has existed. Now, before you try and tell me that doesn't work allow me to ask this. What did animals do to track and kill a prey for their meals before we came along and called it hunting?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Do you realize that your statement is in agreement with mine?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Because in order to have a word for something, it must first exist in reality or thought. Because colors only exist if we see them, a representation of the color must have come before the word. Thus, [b]the fruit came before the color.[/b][/quote] it really isn't... I said things were orange long before the fruit was even discovered. They were called something before we decided to assign it that word in the first place. Much like how hunting existed long before we decided to call it "hunting".

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by CaptainMericah: 12/13/2015 8:50:33 PM
    lol that's the same thing as what I said when I say "the color" I mean the word

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • The fruit came before the color doesn't mean the same as me saying the color itself existed before the fruit did... Not sure where you are getting that from.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Yes, something must be to be named. Unfortunately, thas nothing to do with the conversation. Thanks for the armchair philosophizing, but the discussion is about a color deriving its name from an existing thing, not whether the idea for a color must exist before the name (which is a no-brainer non-statement).

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • it's evidence that the fruit came before the color.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Not to someone who knows what the word 'evidence' means.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Clearly you don't, fûcktard

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Good argument. Think about your position. How does that prove what you're purporting it to?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • So what's the real-world thing that blue is named after?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Are you -blam!-ing stupid? I didn't say the name of something had to be the same name as the color. I said the thing had to be known before the color was known.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I'm providing a counter-argument to your suggestion that because a color is only a concept (or to be more precise, a qualia) that the color orange must have been named after the orange colored fruit. It is true that in order to define a color, an object must exist to compare it to, but the fact that there is no object called a blue is proof that colors are not always named after the objects that they are compared to. Since oranges (the fruit) are not the only orange-colored thing, it's entirely possible that something else orange, let's say a sunset, was the original thing that defined orange as a color, and it was named arbitrarily, just as most other colors are, and that the fruit was later named after the color. I mean, that's not what happened, and the color is named after the fruit, but your argument for why the color [i]must[/i] be named after the fruit is flawed.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by CaptainMericah: 12/1/2015 6:38:46 PM
    I never said colors are always named for a thing. If sunsets were the original orange, why aren't sunsets called oranges? The fruit was named, then that name was used to describe other things of that color. It's most logical, most likely process.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Again, then why isn't water or something called blue?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon