{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/27/2015 10:18:23 PM
31
If you base the validity of an issue based on the responses of stupid people then no issue is worth discussing.
English
-
[quote]If you base the validity of an issue based on the responses of stupid people then no issue is worth discussing.[/quote]
-
[quote]If you base the validity of an issue based on the responses of stupid people then no issue is worth discussing.[/quote]
-
[quote]If you base the validity of an issue based on the responses of stupid people then no issue is worth discussing.[/quote]
-
[quote]If you base the validity of an issue based on the responses of stupid people then no issue is worth discussing.[/quote]
-
[quote]If you base the validity of an issue based on the responses of stupid people then no issue is worth discussing.[/quote]
-
[quote]If you base the validity of an issue based on the responses of stupid people then no issue is worth discussing.[/quote]
-
She was the freaking leader of their movement
-
Being a leader of a movement makes you smart? Lolol
-
Not when it's the "I want this for free" movement
-
That's the point of my post. I was saying that being the leader of a movement doesn't make you smart, as it was sarcasm.
-
The movement pushing for lowering tuition costs isn't lead by a single person, let alone a college student.
-
Of her specific college she was, that says something about the general student body that supports this stuff.
-
That doesn't make the issue any less valid.
-
Nope it doesn't, but it shows a lack of feasibility.
-
No, not at all. It just shows there are uninformed people out there.
-
True, but mathematically we do have to question it
-
Already been done. A 0.5% tax on wallstreet speculation more than funds it.
-
$13 trillion?
-
$13 trillion is not the cost of funding college tuition.
-
http://louderwithcrowder.com/math-the-exact-price-tag-of-all-bernie-sanders-proposed-free-stuff/ What's your honest opinion of this?
-
Well the number of inaccuracies in that link are truly amazing. But let's start with one that forms the basis of the article. The WSJ did [b][u]not[/u][/b] run the numbers. They took the numbers from Gerald Friedman, a Nobel prize winning economist, out of context from his analysis that details how his plan will actually save us money.
-
Probably the stupidest, most bias link you could have provided. Send something that doesn't call him a Communist in the first sentence or has fake swearing and sick dank me-me-s is it and I'll take the argument more seriously
-
So basically you guys are just gonna bash the link and not give me specific inaccuracies, thanks
-
I gave you a specific inaccuracy.
-
If you give terrible proof what do you expect?
