{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/17/2015 2:38:45 PM
9
And then what other Primary would you be using?
Not Kinetic ones; meaning Primary Weapon diversity becomes shit again.
English
-
What the hell difference does it make to YOU if someone uses burn over kinetic? Use what you want
-
Edited by GutturaI: 11/17/2015 8:40:58 PMPeople want to use weapons that are amazing and powerful -- like some of the year 1 weapons (Fatebringer, Year 1 Hawkmoon, Ghorn, etc, etc, etc). Give us more weapons worth using and that is what will create 'greater weapon variety'. I use less primaries now than when we had elementals because the weapons are sub-par compared with Year 1. Thank you.
-
Edited by Hagalaz-27: 11/17/2015 6:48:15 PMThis wouldn't be an issue if there were, say, exotic artifacts that gave elemental damage to any kinetic primary you happen to have equipped.
-
YES!!!
-
Refardless if weapons had burns id still use hung jury. Raid weapons wre garbage a burn wouldnt change that. I wouldnt be surprised tho if bungie makes a material that can add a burn to a certain weapon. Then sell it for silver
-
You have a point but honestly they should have done it the other way and made every legendary and exotic have a burn. Destiny logic: omolon, suros and hakke has the technology to make specials and heavys with burns but they cant apply said technology to primaries, yeah 'cause that makes perfect sense. The only weapons that should even have kenetic are common, uncommon and rare weapons.
-
It's a balance. Do I want a kinetic primary with a great perk and stats or do I go with a solar primary that has poor stats?
-
Or a good weapon with an element too. Oh shikes there goes pve weapon diversity again, sucks.
-
lol opinions vary don't they. Have a nice day.
