{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/20/2015 11:29:13 AM
3
everybody keeps talking about Destiny DLC.
i don't see the taken king as DLC. its a brand new game
rebranded, remodelled and very good
stuff that didn't work has been improved or taken out and new ways of playing have been put in
i did wonder about the price if it was just DLC but its not
its a whole new experience and i love it
i was initially peeved that all my legendary and exotic gear was redundant but its a fresh challenge and i'm now in the groove
i do feel for those that bought HOW and did not finish it
i think it should have been released as destiny 2 and the accounts linked so that people could still play old school if they wanted to
well done Bungie. i hope i stay alive long enough to experience the 10 year plan for Destiny. Stormcaller rocks
English
-
Are you kidding me? A new game? They added one area, similar in scope to the cosmodrome and then let you rerun through the same old locations everyone has seen in the last 370 days. That's it. Reskin some enemies, give them supers like the guardians use, and voila.
-
Didn't a Bungle employee just call the idea of a ten year plan for Destiny laughable? Still looking forward to it?
-
Edited by AnubisXIX82: 9/20/2015 12:02:32 PMIf its a brand new game it should be just that and marketed as such, not require the previous dlc and game to play it. It should of just been Destiny 2 but that leave too much of a gap to make money between house of wolves and Destiny 2 in order to make enough content to release a number sequel
