{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/3/2015 1:22:12 PM
6
Cool theory that presents new questions that I have not thought about.
English
-
-
Well, if we are all a rasputin simulation, what is happening in the real world, do we have real world counterparts, was the collapse something that really happened, and why would rasputin be simulating us in the first place? The last question may seem to have an obvious answer but maybe not.
-
If there were a being capable of such a simulation, what makes you think it would include the itself in the simulation? If we [i]were[/i] to assume that the simulation existed, how can we assume that "Rasputin" exists outside the simulation? Just something to think about.
-
Edited by wastley: 9/3/2015 1:54:21 PMbut how do you know the vex exist outside of the simulation as well. and why would they include themselves? to see how we react to them
-
[quote]but how do you know the vex exist outside of the simulation as well. and why would they include themselves?[/quote] I didn't claim that they did. Any being with the power to create such a simulation would have no reason to care how we react. Additionally, why would you assume that "we"would exist outside the simulation either? In that case, why would they care how "we" react if we don't exist outside of their simulation? This theory makes far too many assumptions and is simply illogical.
-
Oh yeah, that too
