Saying my "math needs help" is insulting. My math is right. Why do you say it needs help? I never said you could earn the max bank every week. I am correct that there are a total of 1200 marks available to bank at one time across 3 characters. I never said unlimited earning per week is bad. In fact, my question wasn't regarding earning potential per week at all. My question as related to bank size. Of course unlimited earning per week is better than limited, that is obvious. Keeping unlimited earning in place, I'd still prefer a larger bank. It does not have to be one or the other. You said "Wallet size being more would only matter if you don't keep an eye on it." Have you been playing from day one? Have you never hit the glimmer max?

Yes beta player yes maxed glimmer and all marks before each dlc. By the math you can only earn 600 per week not 1200 or even 2000. Wallet size never mattered the weekly cap has always sucked IMO. So if you had zero marks vanguard or crucible and wanted a weapon at 150 of either it takes 2 weeks. To buy one of each. Now you can buy anything you want in a single week and all characters count to the same wallet. To me it's a better system. Because I can buy said gun and turn around and get said armor for a different character when you wish. Instead of having to wait tell rest. You want glimmer save silk and banners. 200 each and they stack in the hundreds. Spend the regular glimmer on synthesis. 100 house banners =20000 glimmer.

Wow. You just don't follow do you....It seems like you want to argue with me about something. If that's the case, at least try to argue a counter point to mine. I have said nothing against any of the factual points you've made. Counter to you I've said my math is right, and (to others) that I think a bank cap of 200 is to small. If you want to try an make an argument that doesn't make you look a bit over zealous I recommend making an argument for why the legendary mark bank cap of 200 in TTK is good. Try doing so without talking about how no weekly limit is good, as those are two separate things. Of those two things I have only spoken against one of them. I haven't asked about the system as a whole, only about the bank limit on legendary marks. What reasons do you have against the limit being larger than 200? Also, I'm not wanting for glimmer. I think you misunderstood why I was asking if you had hit the limit. I was just trying to make the point that many people have hit the glimmer cap, and that it matters, as you said (regarding marks) "Wallet size being more would only matter if you don't keep an eye on it." I'm sure most players where still keeping an eye on glimmer when they hit the cap. Unlike marks, save very few items, the glimmer bank allows you to at least purchase a few of any item. I think (but could be wrong) that the Queen's ship might be the only exception. Additionally, glimmer is used on many more things in the game. If the bank limit on glimmer is a problem for players it's reasonable to think the bank limit on legendary marks will be even more so, a problem.

Not argue. I follow perfectly. You said 200 vanguard 200 crucible per character as it stands now. My point is you can't make but 100 of each per week per character which is 600 not 1200. Yes we can bank 400 per character now ever 2 weeks. Not per week. That's why I said bad math. I can easily max my 100 vanguard and crucible per week on all 3 characters by Thursday or Friday. Should we be stuck at 200 no should we be stuck at 25000 glimmer no. My point is I can make more the 1200 marks per week. So as long as nothing cost 200 marks. You can spend all you can possibly earn in a week. Which is way more then 600 per week 2400 a month.