{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/20/2015 7:55:42 AM
2
Who in the community ever asked for a BH or Icebreaker nerf? No one. Gally nerf will only make things worse for non Gally owners too. If they wanted to fix that issue they should have announced OPTIONAL matchmaking.
I barely play PvP (nor much PvE now either) so I don't care about it really. The vast majority of whining comes from the PvP side of things and no matter what there will always be a couple of guns that come out better. Red Death will probably be whined about most after 2.0.
The only way Crucible will be fully balanced would be if everyone has equal access to the same weapons a la Halo but that's not going to happen.
English
-
[quote]Now seriously about 2.0; I'm so sick of hearing "we only asked for 2 guns to be changed!" Let me explain: 2.0 was going to happen no matter what. This was not the result of complaints or a knee jerk reaction, it was a calculated effort to change the game to better fit their vision of how the game should be played. In the explanation, they give clear and concise reasoning why each weapon was changed ( which most of you who are complaining are clearly guilty of.) So please, stop with the "nobody complained about Ice Breaker" talk.[/quote]
-
Your point was that the community is getting what they asked for. I've provided examples where as far as I can see nobody had any issues with certain guns. You are correct though, it would happen anyway. Bungie have to make the most popular weapons (which we grinded and grinded for and then grinded again to level up and the then grinded again to get etheric light for) less effective. That way they provide more incentive to sell their new new DLCs to get the new better weapons that people will grind and grind for and thus the cycle will continue.
