{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/11/2015 11:20:21 PM
14
A potato isn't a vegetable. It is a tuber.
So, what does that say about you-tubers?
English
-
Nice one, however I think the OP missed out something. What thing has less than 46 chromosomes?
-
-
[quote]A potato isn't a vegetable. It is a tuber. So, what does that say about you-tubers?[/quote] Kek
-
I still hold true to my original logic because of this quote from the Daily Mail: [quote]Potatoes are botanically classified as a vegetable[/quote] Also, I believe a Sweet Potato is classified as a tuberous root, while a bush potato is classified as a root. From Wikipedia: [quote]Potatoes are technically tubers, not roots, and sweet potatoes are tuberous roots.[/quote] So... I dunno, really. Even if my original logic is flawed, at least one great thought exists in this thread.
-
[quote]From Wikipedia[/quote] Cause y'know... Wiki is the most trust worthy when it comes to info...
-
First link on the list. Besides, anything that is changed is checked and monitored by staff, 150 of them. I trust it.
-
I would never use it to support my opinions. It would look very untrustworthy if I ever used it to support any opinion or research.
-
Edited by Them7: 7/12/2015 5:50:00 PMI guess it does hold that impression. And it would look pretty untrustworthy on an official document or education things and stuff.
-
0-0 mind = blown
-
Mind. Blown. Oh recon how you grace us with your wisdom and knowledge.
-
I thought it was a starch?
-
Recon is a legend i swear
-
MY LIFE IS A LIE
-
They have down syndrome?
