{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/28/2015 9:15:28 PM
31
So now that gay marriage is legal, are liberals going to shut up now and let the big boys work towards fixing this countries debt?
English
-
Nope. Liberal media outlets are currently pushing for the normalization of pedophilia. Viewing their perversion in a negative light is now bigotry. Expect beastiality and incest next.
-
And here we see the slippery slope fallacy. "First gays, then pedos, finally animals." Can you people be any more retarded?
-
Edited by cxkxr: 10/28/2015 7:16:40 AMThe funny part is, conservatives were right when homosexuality started becoming normalized a decade ago. They predicted that soon pedophilia would be acceptable too. The liberals called them paranoid and said "muh slippery slope!", but lo and behold, every major liberal news outlet is currently pushing the normalization of pedophilia. The latests article from Salon.com was titled, "I'm a Pedophilia, but you're the monster". He claims conservatives are the true monsters for "oppressing" him and "discriminating" against his sexual preference. This is the world you choose.
-
If you truly think that it'll get passed then you are a special kind of stupid. Gay marriage was passed because it was between two consenting adults that know the consequences of their actions. The pedophile is with a child. That child does not know the consequences and can be easily manipulated. One radical liberal pedo does not mean all liberals are supporting it.
-
Technically, the U.S. never has to pay off its debt.
-
When China was buying it maybe, they stopped because the reserve bank kept printing money and devaluing the debt China had bought. If China and Russia manage to start a new oil currency backed by gold you can bet the US will be paying back debt, causing the biggest crash in modern history, next few years are going to be interesting.
-
What a moron. The entire banking system is a never-ending debt cycle. Money has absolutely no value, neither does gold. We could dump all the gold we have into the ocean and humans could still survive. Only resources have real value. The market system is a farce, based entirely on sociopathy and greed (not to mention bad math). Only a resource-based economy could motivate the true potential of humanity.
-
This is potentially the silliest thing I've read all day. [i]Hey guys, remember when we had no monetary system and invention was hardly a thing. That was great.[/i] If you want that say goodbye to The internet Ease of access to technology Massive technological advancements Pretty everything good society has to offer
-
Gold has many industrial/technical uses that it is the best/only choice for, so it does have a value.
-
The passing of gay marriage was done primarily by the courts. Liberals, as you call them, had very little to do with it. Unless of course you count the public opinion pushing the issue. In which case I'm sorry the people like enforcing the constitution for equal rights?
-
Should ignore both and keep spending :-)
-
Yeah, just like the last conservative president did. Lol
-
You can't fix debt with the fractional reserve lending system, your money is made from debt, not backed by any resource (gold/etc). Your founding fathers understood this, but your history was re-written to say they where pissed about taxes (that if you look into it, you will find you weren't paying any, and the brits didn't care). But in the 1920's the banks managed to screw you out of what you gained in the revolution, now you want more money printed each year? It costs more debt to make it. You also don't own the federal reserve bank, the banks do. So to make money costs debt (government bonds), to pay the interest on that, you need go sell more debt, which makes your debt go up more, you can't ever get out of it.
-
[quote]You can't fix debt with the fractional reserve lending system, your money is made from debt, not backed by any resource (gold/etc). Your founding fathers understood this, but your history was re-written to say they where pissed about taxes (that if you look into it, you will find you weren't paying any, and the brits didn't care). But in the 1920's the banks managed to screw you out of what you gained in the revolution, now you want more money printed each year? It costs more debt to make it. You also don't own the federal reserve bank, the banks do. So to make money costs debt (government bonds), to pay the interest on that, you need go sell more debt, which makes your debt go up more, you can't ever get out of it.[/quote]
-
The truth in this post scares me.
-
Shit like this is why I truly believe education should have a decent focus on politics and economics from a fairly young age (like 10 or so)
-
And cause another revolution? Like the us gov wants that.
-
[quote]You can't fix debt with the fractional reserve lending system, your money is made from debt, not backed by any resource (gold/etc). Your founding fathers understood this, but your history was re-written to say they where pissed about taxes (that if you look into it, you will find you weren't paying any, and the brits didn't care). But in the 1920's the banks managed to screw you out of what you gained in the revolution, now you want more money printed each year? It costs more debt to make it. You also don't own the federal reserve bank, the banks do. So to make money costs debt (government bonds), to pay the interest on that, you need go sell more debt, which makes your debt go up more, you can't ever get out of it.[/quote]
-
Edited by Salty CPO: 6/29/2015 6:46:16 AMNope, now if your straight, you have to start dating the same sex, or your a hater
-
This.
-
I could post some facts about the debt when Regan left office, the surplus when Clinton left office, the debt when Bush left...
-
I could post some facts about debt when FDR, carter and Obama were/ are in office
-
Obama took office after eight years of war and a banking crisis, war takes a nation years to financially recover from, I'm not sure why you feel Obama is somehow responsible for the financial burdens his administration has had to deal with.
-
You could.
-
you can look this stuff up pretty easy, but I'll help you out. Clinton left Bush with something like 280 billion surplus and 'conservative ' tax cuts alone cost over 3 trillion during the Bush years before you even get into two illegal wars (I'm an Army vet so don't even get me started on wasting men and material). Here's an article and a chart I scratched up in about thirty seconds" http://www.businessinsider.com/how-clinton-surplus-became-a-6t-deficit-2013-1 The problem with the idea that Republicans are 'financially conservative' is that they are not. Calling yourself something does not make you that thing if you act in a different way. Conserving something means to hold and maintain it, or in the case of our economic situation, perhaps to improve it. We are currently at a smaller deficit than when Obama took office due to both parties (trying to) working together, but as long as the richest Americans and big business pay a lower percentage of taxes than everyone else, but reap more profits the economy will continue to suffer since more and more of the nation's wealth is out of the tax base. This is economics 101 and it boggles my mind that anyone can argue against the idea of everyone paying their equal share.
