Here's the thing. You said a "( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) is a ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)." Is it in the same ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)? Yes. No one's arguing that. As someone who is a ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) who studies ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°), I am telling you, specifically, in ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°), no one calls ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°). If you want to be "( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing. If you're saying "( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)family" you're referring to the ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)grouping of ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°), which includes things from ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) to ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) to ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°). So your reasoning for calling a ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) a ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) is because random people "call the ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ones ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)?" Let's get ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) and ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) or an ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)? It's not ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)or the ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°), that's not how ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) works. They're both. A ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) is a ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) and a member of the ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) family. But that's not what you said. You said a ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) is a ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°), which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) family( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°), which means you'd call ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°), ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°), and other ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°), too. Which you said you don't. It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?