{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/19/2015 4:52:43 PM
8
So the meaning of this economics lesson is that you can afford to pay for all of us?
Yay!
English
-
No. The meanings of this economics lesson is if you can't afford to pay for it...you should get your priorities in order
-
I know right (Bungie fanboy) because EVERY single thing I see that I want for $15... I SHOULD (by your broken logic) be able to pay for and have, IF I have a job. Does that just about Sum up your position on a $15 expenditure such as House of Wolves? I THOUGHT SO!!!
-
What the flying -blam!- are you talking about
-
Something you don't understand. That's okay. Go right ahead and keep playing.
-
Sure...lol
-
Not should, could. Most people get paid weekly/biweekly, meaning they could plan to not spend $15 on one thing to get another you wanted
-
So what you are doing is placing your chosen $17.50 to $20 ABOVE other things of equal or lesser or greater value that a person/customer might desire to purchase. This is a flawed argument. You only see this as legitimate because of your bias towards THIS particular $20 purchase.
-
I do this almost every week? If I want to buy a game, I won't spend as much on food or buy food and make stuff at home.
