I understand that you are upset, and I understand that you want to let it out, but can you please not use Christ's name in vain? I don't want to start a fight, I just ask if you can please respect what I believe. I'll pray for you, and hope you can get to know Jesus as The Gracious and Merciful God. :)

[quote]hyped this game.[/quote]

??

Really OP... 2 minute video of in game engine released.... ...and everybody get's their knickers in a bunch. Fact - No one has any idea about amount of content and actual gameplay at the moment.... except the devs. Ya'll are pretty sad...

[quote]Christ on a cross you guys will bitch about ANYTHING[/quote]. So what if we are bitching? We wanted a real battlefront experience not Battlefield reskin with star wars. [quote]I'm getting this game day one, and unless DICE forces everyone to play as Ewoks, I am going to play and love the shit out of this game. 40 player limit is perfect IMO. 4 squads of 5 people roaming on foot, vehicle or air vehicles. Heroes are back! The planets are going to be gorgeous (and there have only been 4 confirmed planets, there will still be more). DICE blows ass at singleplayer, so I'm glad they are devoting more time to making the multiplayer badass. I'm perfectly fine with the game taking place during the original saga (Hell, we even get Jakku as a planet!).[/quote] Everything in there is subjective, like everyone else's opinion, go ahead and buy it, people fell mad about this. [quote]With the amount of BITCHING in this thread, I feel like I'm in the minority of the minority when it comes to being hyped for this game.[/quote] Many Battlefront fans are disappointed, hell i already consider the old games better, even those games had more content than what this reboot will have. [quote]I was expecting A LOT from DICE, and I am happy as hell for what we are getting. The only downside I can see is no space battles, but they might throw that in DLC or something.[/quote] Good for you, let people vent, this BF series was a childhood memory for many fans.

It seems like you are arguing for the sake of arguing. I assume you weren't at the presentation to see actual gameplay. I assume you don't work at DICE. Therefore, you have seen jack and shit for gameplay. [quote]So what if we are bitching?[/quote]Do you take anyone in your life seriously when they are complaining about something, without actually having used said thing? Or seen it? Or know everything about it? Bitching, especially at this stage in development for Battlefront, serves no purpose. None. It puts you in the spotlight of being seen as someone complaining for the sake of complaining. [quote]We wanted a real battlefront experience not Battlefield reskin with star wars.[/quote]Oh, so this Battlefront is not a "real battlefront experience"? And how exactly would you know that? What makes a Battlefront game "real battlefront experience"? -Star Wars? Check -Rebels vs Empire? Check -Multiple planets with multiple maps per planet? Check -Land vehicles? Check -Air vehicles? Check -Multiplayer? Check -Heroes? Check -3rd person? Check We don't know modes, but it's safe to assume a conquest based game mode will return. There are more players. The visuals are better. The game runs at 60 frames per second. It has the added benefit of a more focused multiplayer experience. Instead of a tacked on singleplayer (which DICE is notoriously bad for), we get a more fleshed out multiplayer. You're able to switch between 3rd and 1st person on the fly when you're a foot soldier. It seems like you are trying to shoehorn YOUR definition of a "real battlefront experience" into Battlefront. You don't like the way DICE is handling this game? (which is ludicrous, because we haven't even seen or heard of everything in the game) Then don't buy it. One less close minded individual for me to play with/against. [quote]Everything in there is subjective,[/quote]Wrong. -DICE isn't forcing people to play as Ewoks, that isn't subjective. (I was being jovial about that) -40 player limit, that isn't subjective. -Air and land vehicles are in, that isn't subjective. -Heroes are back, that isn't subjective. -Planets are gorgeous, that is subjective. However, they will be highly detailed and rich with vibrant colors and textures. -4 confirmed planets + 1 Jakku planet, with perhaps more in DLC, that isn't subjective. -DICE blows ass at singleplayer, that isn't subjective. Battlefield 3 and 4 say hello. -Devoting more time to make multiplayer, that isn't subjective. DICE is literally not making a fully fledged campaign so they can focus on the MP more. Perhaps you need to look up the word "subjective" in the dictionary. [quote]go ahead and buy it[/quote]I will. [quote]people fell mad about this[/quote]People "fell" good about this as well. Don't just take the bad. Take the good as well. Go to the trailer on Youtube. There is an absolute metric shit ton of positivity in there. [quote]Many Battlefront fans are disappointed,[/quote]Your point? You expect DICE to be able to please every single Battlefront fan in existence? There are also many Battlefront fans that are happy with this. [quote]hell i already consider the old games better,[/quote]How can you consider games made a decade ago to be better than a game coming out this year, of which you have not seen footage of? It boggles my mind how you can think like that. [quote] even those games had more content than what this reboot will have.[/quote]Oh lord.

[quote]It seems like you are arguing for the sake of arguing[/quote] The same exact excuse everyone says when an argument happens. [quote]I assume you weren't at the presentation to see actual gameplay. I assume you don't work at DICE. Therefore, you have seen jack and shit for gameplay.[/quote] Yes because having good game mechanics is enough right? Tell that to Destiny, also if you really can read everyone is disappointed because of what DICE has announced, no one is biting themselves because of the game mechanics. [quote]Do you take anyone in your life seriously when they are complaining about something, without actually having used said thing? Or seen it? Or know everything about it? Bitching, especially at this stage in development for Battlefront, serves no purpose. None. It puts you in the spotlight of being seen as someone complaining for the sake of complaining[/quote] So we must accept any crap that developers throw at us because we haven't seen it or heard it? All they announced os official information for the game and people have the right to complain about it. If they continue the development of battlefront they way they are doing it, we might as well say goodbye to the great series the game is. [quote]Oh, so this Battlefront is not a "real battlefront experience"? And how exactly would you know that? What makes a Battlefront game "real battlefront experience"? -Star Wars? Check -Rebels vs Empire? Check -Multiple planets with multiple maps per planet? Check -Land vehicles? Check -Air vehicles? Check -Multiplayer? Check -Heroes? Check -3rd person? Check[/quote] So because a game has star wars in it therefore is a Battlefront experience? Well damn Star Wars kinect was so breathtaking then right? It doesn't have the prequel era (which was present both the first and second installment) no space battles which became popular in the second installment, we don't know how many maps they are but DICE/EA has big plans for dlc, so expect like 8-9 maps only. Also any game can have vehicles and third person and call itself a star wars game, like Star wars demolition and Lego Star Wars. [quote]We don't know modes, but it's safe to assume a conquest based game mode will return.[/quote] No one is arguing that. [quote]There are more players.[/quote] While old games had lesser real players (10 or 15) it was filled with plenty of A.I units which made the game up to 64 units playing. This one only has 20 v 20 for one mode and the rest haven't been confirmed. [quote]The visuals are better. The game runs at 60 frames per second. It has the added benefit of a more focused multiplayer experience.[/quote] Again, that's not the big issue why everyone is complaining. [quote]Instead of a tacked on singleplayer (which DICE is notoriously bad for), we get a more fleshed out multiplayer.[/quote] A more fleshed out MP? Then why the hell are Co-Op missions available? DICE is also notoriously known for some unnecessary game modes. [quote]You're able to switch between 3rd and 1st person on the fly when you're a foot soldier.[/quote] You still don't seem to grasp the real issues with the game. [quote]It seems like you are trying to shoehorn YOUR definition of a "real battlefront experience" into Battlefront. You don't like the way DICE is handling this game? (which is ludicrous, because we haven't even seen or heard of everything in the game)[/quote] Yea because there wasn't a live stream today about the whole game and IGN, GameInformer, Gamespot and others didnt release a plethora of news today right? [quote]Then don't buy it. One less close minded individual for me to play with/against[/quote]. You sure I'm the close-minded one? [quote]-40 player limit, that isn't subjective[/quote] For one game mode, the rest might end up as Battlefield. And the fact that you prefer the 40 player limit and call everyone else's opinion unnecessary of the same topic is being subjective. [quote]-Air and land vehicles are in, that isn't subjective.[/quote] No one is arguing that. [quote]-Heroes are back, that isn't subjective.[/quote] They work different now tho. [quote]-Planets are gorgeous, that is subjective. However, they will be highly detailed and rich with vibrant colors and textures. -4 confirmed planets + 1 Jakku planet, with perhaps more in DLC, that isn't subjective. -DICE blows ass at singleplayer, that isn't subjective. Battlefield 3 and 4 say hello. -Devoting more time to make multiplayer, that isn't subjective. DICE is literally not making a fully fledged campaign so they can focus on the MP more. Perhaps you need to look up the word "subjective" in the dictionary.[/quote] Most of the part that i quoted is subjective, did DICE -blam!-ed with the Bf4 campaign? Yes they did but if you haven't played Battlefield Bad Company you would've known they created a really fun single player experience. Also you based most of them as positives, not everyone agrees with you so you can't say they aren't subjective because you think they are good for the game. [quote][quote]people fell mad about this[/quote]People "fell" good about this as well. Don't just take the bad. Take the good as well. Go to the trailer on Youtube. There is an absolute metric shit ton of positivity in there.[/quote] Yea because youtube comments are the answer right? Same went for Destiny, Halo 4, Battlefield 4, COD advanced Warfare, Titanfall, killzone Shadowfall, Ryse, the order 1886 and look how they all ended. [quote]You expect DICE to be able to please every single Battlefront fan in existence? There are also many Battlefront fans that are happy with this.[/quote] No but plenty of expected the game to jold to the old BF roots, Which it doesnt. [quote]How can you consider games made a decade ago to be better than a game coming out this year, of which you have not seen footage of? It boggles my mind how you can think like that.[/quote] Well let's see, the old games have more stuff to do than this, all this reboot has is the MP modes (which clearly are Conquest, Deathmatch, the spider walker thing with 40 players and a squad based mode, the old BF games had Capture the Flag, Hunt, Galactic Conquest (which is a staple in the series), Hero mode even tho it was only in one map, four factions to play as, more maps with no DLC included, 501st journal from BF2, space battles, instant action which let you make your own matches however you please and much more. [quote][quote] even those games had more content than what this reboot will have.[/quote]Oh lord.[/quote] It's the true so....

Wow bro your life must really suck if you actually put that much effort into complaining about something you know barely anything about. I really hope this game is as terrible to you as you think it will be. Otherwise, you'll have one less thing to cry about.

Hey you're the one joining arguments to tell people how their life sucks. Not my problem you get butthurt over other people's opinions based on what DICE has officially announced.

[quote] So because a game has star wars in it therefore is a Battlefront experience? [/quote] No but a 3rd person large scale sandbox team shooter with heavy objective emphasis set in the Star Wars universe is, in fact, a Battlefront experience. You people are always saying you don't want a Battlefield reskin, and that's fine to not want that, but Battlefront [i]was[/i] always just a Battlefield reskin; it had the exact same game modes with the exact same gameplay premise and the exact same class system, barring the TPS POV. BFII tried to make itself different by adding in space combat but that just wound up being dog fighting in a new skybox, and isolated from the rest of the game. So we have new mechanics--vehicles must be earned and not spawned with, there appears to be new and interesting equipment like shields and jetpacks making for greater tactical variety, and the return of Heroes; how this is anymore Battlefield than the past games is completely beyond me. With the new futuristic abilities like I mentioned before, it's [i]less[/i] like Battlefield than ever before. Battlefront wasn't the second coming of videogame Jesus some people make it out to be. And while the lack of prequel content will be painful, I can get over it if only for the lack of the objectively overpowered CIS. What matters is if the game is fun. I still play Titanfall because it's fun. And seeing as how they've barely begun talking about the game, it's too early to cast judgement until we see proper gameplay.