{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/10/2015 11:15:25 PM
13
-
We're gonna hopefully cure cancer with them pretty soon.
-
How bout we don't cure cancer. I mean, something worse is gonna come around. Like super cancer.
-
Or that lol
-
Nanobots could cure basicly every known disease. It could render our white blood cells useless because they do their job better.
-
Yeah, then something comes around and kills off the nanobots. Then people are dying left and right because they have no immune system.
-
That's an absolute worst case scenario. Either way when you can get an injection to have nanobots put into your body to support and improve it in whatever way they will il be getting it.
-
Murphy's Law.
-
It's not like we will invent nanobots and just call it done. We will continue R&D for many many years to come. So sooner or later we will work out all of the kinks. I get where your coming from but I'm more optimistic about it. Only time will tell. It's not like we will force you to get them.
-
[i]Murphy's Law[/i]
-
Don't want them don't take them.
-
You can't kill something that isn't alive. A virus needs something to put its DNA into. It would take an extremely long time for something which has literally no thoughts to learn to fight something that is specifically designed to kill them.
-
I used the word in a colloquial sense. As in they become eliminated, defunct, redundant, or otherwise useless.
-
That wouldn't happen, though, because they can constantly be updated and replaced.
