{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/14/2013 10:23:10 AM
6
Its good for an infant to have it done, medically beneficial.
English
-
Its medically 'beneficial' mostly once you hit the age of sexual activity, the -blam!- does a baby need that tiny percentage less likelihood of contracting an STD for?
-
He doesn't, but its more difficult later in life to get it, it also makes the penis look larger (Which no one can really complain about) Honestly, there is no downside to having this done. The haters are simply making a big deal out of nothing.
-
How the -blam!- does getting circumcised make your penis look larger. I'm not against just wondering.
-
The head is more exposed, so it looks a little bigger.
-
If an uncircumcised person retracted the foreskin it would act the same then am I correct.
-
I'd argue the downside is cutting a baby unnecessarily, sovereignty over ones own body etc. It doe have some risks too, but mainly I wouldn't have my kid cut because its not my decision. At the end of the day, people just do it because they had it done to them and consider it normal, which is pretty tarded
