{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by cxkxr:
2/26/2015 5:49:07 PM
5
Anyone who supports this, probably has no idea what it even is. Just because it has an appealing name, doesn't mean shit. It's like the "patriot act", it's tyranny veiled behind rhetoric.
"The urge to save humanity, is almost always a false-front for the urge to rule"
English
-
Do you understand what was voted on today?
-
Edited by cxkxr: 2/26/2015 6:24:27 PMThere was no congressional vote. The vote was won 3-2 by a few bureaucrats within the FCC alone. Also, if you have a direct link to the 300+ page document, I'd like to read it for myself. Oh wait, you can't, because it's not made public. All we have is the rhetoric of politicians to go on. If you support the passing of bills, before you know what's in them, you're a real danger to the public.
-
[quote]Also, if you have a direct link to the 300+ page document, I'd like to read it for myself. Oh wait, you can't, because it's not made public. All we have is the rhetoric of politicians to go on.[/quote]This is the FCC's protocol. Documents aren't publicly released until all opinions have been submitted.
-
Edited by Bloom Unknown : 2/27/2015 1:15:09 AMYes but we should be able to and should continue to trust our politicians until they prove otherwise (case by case). What happened to innocent until proven guilty ? If we make our judgments based on how net neutrality has been described, it's understandable to be optimistic about this decision. If there is a tax or fee or regulation that undermines the ideas on which net neutrality were sold to the public, then that would be bad. So I guess I do not understand the pessimism from the right wing conservative's and the like unless they know something we don't?
