{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/22/2015 9:05:48 PM
7
-
Look, I get that the article (and this post) isn't meant to be taken that seriously, but I feel like it's not too much to ask for people to read it if they actually have something serious to say.
-
No, I have 56 credits in science alone, any thing you say is wrong.
-
Edited by Hoggs Bison: 2/22/2015 9:47:47 PMFirstly, I think it's awesome that you're taking this post so seriously. I guess everything looks like a journal when you spend too much time on JSTOR. Secondly, it's redundant to say that your 56 credits are in "science alone"; nobody is faster to brag about their credit-hours than pure science-- or less able to recognize their irrelevance.
-
And if you're talking about scientific measuring, shouldn't you use Kelvin?
-
No, I have 56 credits in measuring alone, any thing you say is wrong.
-
Dude I have 56 credits in science too!
-
We should start a club! I nominate angry0lbgrampa as our fearless leader.
