{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
由BannedLlama编辑：
7/5/2014 8:31:50 AM
18
-
[quote] 343 just wanted to milk the series.[/quote] Bungie set the game up to launch another trilogy out of it because of the legendary ending. The flood wasn't finished on the Ark and there would still be Covenant fleets out there. The only thing they ended in that game was Truth and most of the Covenant.
-
由BannedLlama编辑： 7/6/2014 2:43:45 PM1. Halo 3 was supposed to be the [b][u]end of Master Chief's story[/u][/b] 2. [quote]Bungie set the game up to launch another trilogy out of it because of the legendary ending [/quote] Yeah... That doesn't mean anything. Take a look at Mass Effect 3 for example. If you achieve the 'best' ending you'll get a scene in the end where you see Shepard breath. That could mean anything. Same thing applies for the scene when Forward Unto Dawn approachs Requim.
-
And look at that, they are doing a mass effect 4. But the Halo 3 terminals directly refer to the chiefs story not being finished. "The path ahead is fraught with peril, but I will do what I can to keep you safe." --paraphrased mendicant bias.
