{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/9/2014 7:12:33 PM
1
I didn't say that it wouldn't be cool to have, since the original games had it. But I'm saying that it'd also be perfect with only material from the original trilogy and nothing would be lost.
English
-
The Battle over Coruscant would be lost. Space battles between the Empire and the Rebels are amazing and I love those ship designs as well, but I love the extreme chaos and disorganization of the Battle of Coruscant. There is no order at all, there are just ships everywhere mixed in with each other. I love it.
-
You are talking about the Galactic Civil War though, not the Clone Wars. There is a huge difference between the two. I want both, they have different capital ships, different frigates, different fighters, bombers, transports, different troops, different planets where they actually fought. The types of ships dramatically change the feel of the battle. Star Destroyers and Mon Calamari Cruisers are great and all, but I want to see some Venators, Providence-class carriers, Munificent-class destroyers, and Lucrehulk battleships. Lucrehulks are larger than Star Destroyers, and it would be more fun to have ships with different shapes, instead of just triangles. I would also like to see the Executor though.
-
Nah, I'm talking about the Clone Wars. I'd be entirely content if they were not in the game and it was only focused on the Galactic Civil War because it wouldn't miss much gameplay wise and if it means they get a more focused game then all the better. That's the core Star Wars. I'm not saying they should cut Clone Wars part which is surely in, I'm just saying I wouldn't care if they did as long as the reason wasn't "we rushed it and didn't have time for them". More content is always good as long as it's not sacrificing enjoyability for it.
