Well he has a point after all Israel will likely lose influence. But one can say both sides have been part of the war. Only thing though is whether removing sanction and being okay will be alright.

That's not really what I was talking about, though. I was merely commenting that he has a point about Iran's involvement in Syria, as well as not having blind optimism about loosening sanctions against Iran. I was also indirectly addressing the comments on the Reuters page. They seem to think that Netanyahu didn't have any credible points and that he is "the greatest threat to world peace" as well as saying he is much like Hitler. I found those comments to be tremendously stupid.

True, though i will say that according to your first point on having blind optimism about loosening sanctions against Iran, will not really be any different than Pakistan getting Nukes. From what i heard is the whole issue over Iran getting Nukes is a replay of the Pakistan India crisis.

[quote]will not really be any different than Pakistan getting Nukes[/quote]It's a little different, and by 'little', I mean somewhat significantly. Pakistan really only competes for power and influence in South Asia with India; whereas Iran competes with not only Israel but the entirety of the G.C.C. A nuclear Iran challenges a proportionally larger regional dynamic situation. [quote]From what i heard is the whole issue over Iran getting Nukes is a replay of the Pakistan India crisis.[/quote]If by that you mean: By Iran going nuclear, it will make it's geopolitical rivals further their own nuclear program. Then, you will be somewhat correct as that is a valid concern regarding Iran's nuclear program and the G.C.C's. [url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/03/05/us-gulf-nuclear-meeting-idUSL0521283720070305]It's from 2007, but still relevant[/url].