{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
由Hipi07编辑：
7/27/2013 5:06:45 PM
26
FOX Engine VS FrostBite 3
[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMyoCr2MnpM&list=FL0k2A4-gC9uUet6SY1Pa5PQ]Metal Gear Solid 5 - FOX Engine[/url]
[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sclTMEd7JN8]Battlefield 4 - Frostbite 3[/url]
From these videos, which gaming engine do you think is better? Take into account that a lot of Metal Gear Solid 5 hasn't been revealed, unlike BF4.
Each engine is better than the other in their own regards, but which engine is better overall of the two?
Accidentally put Frostbite 2 for some reason on the poll, whoops. It's the 3rd.
Discuss.
-
16 回复
-
1 回复
-
由Reign of Bane编辑： 5/24/2014 10:45:59 AMSits there laughing... It has to be Frostbite 3 engine, glitchy as -blam!-. Rainbow coloured levels (psychedelic), invisible gun when spawned, invisible enemies and invisible when jumping on Atvs and Bikes and going to 3rd person perspective. Invisible wall when throwing grenades while in prone behind, ammo & medical boxes. Well done EA for pushing Dice into releasing an unfinished game to increase your profit margins. You owe me money bitches, wasn't aware that I was paying £80 (including season pass) for a beta. Feels like I have been mugged!
-
1 回复The Frostbite 3 engine is breathtakingly amazing. It's a shame that the rest of the game (BF4) can't keep up with itself due to its netcode and visual glitches.
-
Frostbite does destruction/some other dynamic stuff that only has to happen once a match that's pretty much it other than -blam!-ing sunglare. Fox Engine >Entirely Open World >Dynamic night and day >Dynamic weather >Incredible detail throughout everything >Has to deal with game mechanics while doing all of this other stuff. Such as stealth, shooting, advanced AI >Smart enemies, where as Battlefield only deals with players Also look at this -blam!-ing video
-
2 回复
-
1 回复
-
1 回复
-
3 回复
-
1 回复
