此讨论源自于另一个讨论: 查看原始贴子
-
1 回复You're right goyim-ur I mean good sir! Who else could have possibly been behind it other than those evil Islamist Radicals!
-
2 回复I don't trust the government enough to believe what they say. It's too much coincidence for me to fully believe all the events on 9/11 happened by a few people hijacking planes. The government ether did it themselves or let it happen.
-
1 回复No plane could have made the maneuver to ht the pentagon. The plane would have broken up and no pilot could ever do it. And yes planes hit the buildings, but fell like it imploded at the base. They used a tragic event to take away our right and further put mankind into the system.
-
1 回复You're going to believe the same government that told you there WMD's and have we found any, no. The same government that spies on you and lies about it. The same government that without a doubt has "strange" symbols on their dollar bills "Novus ordo seclorum" announcing the new world order. DARPA investing money in mind control. Fluoride in your water. The government that kills hundreds of innocent civilians in the Middle East in drone strikes, but mourns the loss of 20 children. It's pathetic.
-
2 回复Because our government has no ties the Middle East. None whatsoever. Nothing to see. Nothing to think. Move along. All hail MSNBC Obama the messiah. Thank God for credit card debt!
-
14 回复
-
4 回复And people who believe what the government said about it and didn't use it to circumvent our rights are equally stupid. The biggest conspiracy theorists that day are our own government. I have a few unanswered questions. The twin towers were designed to withstand several impacts of those types of jets, it's quite the coincidence they both fell from one hit, but even if you believe that... Tower 7 could NOT have fallen by fire alone. The "plane" that hit the Pentagon just happened to hit all of the files that would have accounted for the missing $2.2 trillion in military spending that slipped Donald Rumsfeld's mind. After ten years of suing under the FOIA, out of the 68 cameras that could have seen the "plane" hit the Pentagon we got five still images that NEVER SHOW A PLANE. Also, the nearly 30 year standing order to scramble jets after such an occurrence was changed three months prior to the attack and drills nearly identical to the attack were happening at the exact same time (Like Boston's bombing and some terrorist attacks in Britain) which confused people who couldn't decipher if there was an actual attack or just a drill.
-
1 回复
-
8 回复Pizza! Pizza! ([url=http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842]exactly[/url])
-
1 回复Why do you believe what you believe? Is it because you were told it was terrorists by your government and you think, hey there's no way my government could lie to me, might as well just believe what they tell me and never have an opinion of my own.
-
4 回复Actually those people are rational thinkers who don't accept what the government says as fact when there's multiple things that contradict the governments claims.
-
1 回复由Brociopath编辑: 7/1/2013 12:53:26 AM
-
16 回复
-
5 回复
-
1 回复
-
24 回复Oh ya, and there are over 1,300 architects and engineers who agree the buildings should not have fallen. Including the person that designed the twin towers who said a plane hitting the building would be akin to shoving a pencil through a screen door. http://www.ae911truth.org/news/41-articles/407-buildingwhat-appears-on-geraldo-at-large-on-fox-news.html